Search the corpus

    Open and closed subschemes, and closed immersions

    D-SCHSUB

    An open subscheme of \(X\) is an open \(U \subseteq \abs{X}\) with \(\OO_U \da \ro{\OO_X}{U}\); every open subset of a scheme is a scheme in exactly one way.

    A closed immersion \(i: Z \to X\) is a morphism which is a homeomorphism onto a closed subset and for which \(i^\sharp: \OO_X \to i_* \OO_Z\) is surjective. A closed subscheme is an equivalence class of closed immersions into \(X\).

    Closed subschemes of \(\Spec A\) correspond exactly to ideals \(\mfa \normal A\), via \(Z = \Spec(A/\mfa)\). In general, closed subschemes of \(X\) correspond to quasicoherent ideal sheaves \(\mci \subseteq \OO_X\), with \(\OO_Z = \OO_X/\mci\).

    (Closed subscheme sequences)

    For a closed immersion \(i: Z \to X\) with ideal sheaf \(\mci\) there is an exact sequence of \(\OO_X\)-modules \[ 0 \to \mci \to \OO_X \to i_* \OO_Z \to 0 , \] and tensoring with a locally free \(\OO_X\)-module \(\mce\) keeps it exact: \(0 \to \mci \tensor \mce \to \mce \to i_*(i^* \mce) \to 0\). If \(Z = D\) is an effective Cartier divisor, then \(\mci = \OO_X(-D) = \OO_X(D)^\vee\), giving \[ 0 \to \OO_X(-D) \to \OO_X \to \OO_D \to 0 , \qquad 0 \to \mcl(-D) \to \mcl \to \ro{\mcl}{D} \to 0 \] for every invertible sheaf \(\mcl\). [@Har10a, Proposition II.6.18]

    An open subset carries a unique induced scheme structure, while a closed subset can carry many closed-subscheme structures: \(V(x)\) and \(V(x^2)\) in \(\AA^1\) have the same support and different ideal sheaves.

    For a closed immersion \(i\), the map on global sections \(\OO_X(X) \to \OO_Z(Z)\) need not be surjective: for \(Z=\ts{0,\infty}\subseteq\PP^1_k\) with its reduced structure, it is the diagonal \(k\to k\times k\).

    A closed subscheme of an open subscheme is a locally closed subscheme; an immersion is a morphism that is an isomorphism onto a locally closed subscheme (D-MORIMM).

    What is an open subscheme? A closed subscheme?
    What do closed subschemes of an affine scheme correspond to?
    Give an irreducible scheme that is not reduced, and two distinct schemes with the same support.
    What is the $n$th infinitesimal neighbourhood of a prime $\mfp \in \Spec A$?
    Show that a scheme is reduced if and only if all its stalks are reduced.

    Dependencies

    • D-AN662Schemes, and morphisms of schemesuses

    Backlinks

    • PR-SCHINTScheme-theoretic intersection as a fibre productuses
    • D-SCHREDThe reduced induced structure on a closed subsetuses
    • D-SCHIMGThe scheme-theoretic image of a morphismuses

    What links to this