Search the corpus

    Natural boundaries of the lacunary series $\sum z^{2^n}$ and $\sum 2^{-n\alpha}z^{2^n}$

    E-SS2.PR-1

    Area
    Complex Analysis
    Topics
    Power Series
    Status
    draft
    1. Here are some examples of analytic functions on the unit disc that cannot be extended analytically past the unit circle. The following definition is needed. Let \(f\) be a function defined in the unit disc D, with boundary circle C. A point w on C is said to be regular for \(f\) if there is an open neighborhood U of w and an analytic function \(g\) on \(U _ { i }\) , so that \(f = g\) on \(\mathbb { D } \cap U\) . A function f defined on D cannot be continued analytically past the unit circle if no point of C is regular for \(f .\)
    1. Let

    \[ f (z) = \sum_ {n = 0} ^ {\infty} z ^ {2 ^ {n}} \quad \text { for } | z | < 1. \]

    Notice that the radius of convergence of the above series is 1. Show that f cannot be continued analytically past the unit disc. [Hint: Suppose \(\theta = { 2 \pi p } / { 2 ^ { k } }\) , where \(p\) and k are positive integers. Let \(z = r e ^ { i \theta }\) ; then \(| f ( r e ^ { i \theta } ) | \longrightarrow \infty \mathrm { \ a s \ } r \longrightarrow 1 . ]\)

    1. \(^\ast\) Fix \(0 < \alpha < \infty\) . Show that the analytic function f defined by

    \[ f (z) = \sum_ {n = 0} ^ {\infty} 2 ^ {- n \alpha} z ^ {2 ^ {n}} \quad \text { for } | z | < 1 \]

    extends continuously to the unit circle, but cannot be analytically continued past the unit circle. [Hint: There is a nowhere diferentiable function lurking in the background. See Chapter 4 in Book I.]

    Solution

    Throughout, a dyadic point is \(e^{i\theta}\) with \(\theta = 2\pi p / 2^k\), \(p,k\) positive integers; dyadic points are dense in \(C\). The set of regular points of a function on \(\mathbb D\) is open in \(C\), so if it contains no dyadic point, it is empty.

    1. (1a) \(f(z)=\sum_{n\ge0} z^{2^n}\) cannot be continued analytically past \(C\).

    Let \(\theta = 2\pi p / 2^k\). For \(n \ge k\), \(2^n\theta\) is a multiple of \(2\pi\), so \((re^{i\theta})^{2^n} = r^{2^n}\) and \[f(re^{i\theta}) = \sum_{n=0}^{k-1} (re^{i\theta})^{2^n} + \sum_{n=k}^{\infty} r^{2^n}.\] Each term of the second sum tends to \(1\) as \(r\to1^-\), and the terms are nonnegative, so the second sum tends to \(\infty\); hence \(\abs{f(re^{i\theta})}\to\infty\). A function regular at a boundary point is bounded near it, so no dyadic point is regular, and no point of \(C\) is regular.

    2. (1b) \(f(z)=\sum_{n\ge0} 2^{-n\alpha} z^{2^n}\) extends continuously to \(\overline{\mathbb D}\) and cannot be continued analytically past \(C\).

    Since \(\sum 2^{-n\alpha} < \infty\), the Weierstrass \(M\)-test shows that the series converges uniformly on \(\overline{\mathbb D}\), so \(f\) extends continuously. Suppose a dyadic point \(e^{i\theta}\), \(\theta = 2\pi p/2^k\), were regular. Then \(f\) agrees near \(e^{i\theta}\) with a function analytic on a neighborhood of \(e^{i\theta}\), so for every \(m\) the derivative \(\frac{d^m}{dr^m}f(re^{i\theta})=e^{im\theta}f^{(m)}(re^{i\theta})\) stays bounded as \(r\to1^-\). But \(f(re^{i\theta})=P(r)+\sum_{n\ge k}2^{-n\alpha}r^{2^n}\) with \(P\) a polynomial, and for an integer \(m\ge\alpha\), \[\frac{d^m}{dr^m}\sum_{n\ge k}2^{-n\alpha}r^{2^n}\ge\sum_{n\ge n_0}2^{-n\alpha}\bigl(2^{n-1}\bigr)^m r^{2^n-m},\] where \(n_0\ge k\) is chosen with \(2^{n_0}\ge2m\), so that \(2^n(2^n-1)\cdots(2^n-m+1)\ge(2^{n-1})^m\). As \(r\to1^-\) the right side tends to \(2^{-m}\sum_{n\ge n_0}2^{n(m-\alpha)}=\infty\). Hence no dyadic point is regular, and no point of \(C\) is regular.