Search the corpus

    Ramsey bound $R(m+1,n+1)\le\binom{m+n}{m}$

    P-BKS10-9B

    Area
    Prelim
    Seen at
    BERKELEY
    Years
    2010
    Status
    draft

    Prove that if every edge of the complete graph on \[ \binom{m+n}{m} \] vertices is colored red or blue, then there is either a complete red subgraph on \(m+1\) vertices or a complete blue subgraph on \(n+1\) vertices.

    Hint: choose a vertex, partition the remaining vertices according to the color of their edge to it, and induct on \(m+n\).

    Solution

    1. If \(m=0\) or \(n=0\), the assertion holds.

    If \(m=0\), then a complete red subgraph on \[ m+1=1 \] vertex is just any vertex. Similarly, if \(n=0\), any vertex is a complete blue subgraph on \(n+1=1\) vertex.

    2. Suppose \(m,n>0\) and set\[ N\coloneqq\binom{m+n}{m}. \]For any chosen vertex \(v\), let \(R\) be the set of vertices joined to \(v\) bya red edge and \(B\) the set joined to \(v\) by a blue edge. Then either\[ \abs{R} \geq \binom{m+n-1}{m-1} \]or\[ \abs{B} \geq \binom{m+n-1}{m}. \]

    The sets \(R\) and \(B\) partition the other \(N-1\) vertices, so \[ \abs{R}+\abs{B}=N-1. \] Pascal’s identity gives \[ N = \binom{m+n-1}{m-1} + \binom{m+n-1}{m}. \] If both displayed lower bounds failed, integrality would give \[ \abs{R} \leq \binom{m+n-1}{m-1}-1 \] and \[ \abs{B} \leq \binom{m+n-1}{m}-1. \] Adding would yield \[ \abs{R}+\abs{B}\leq N-2, \] contradicting \(\abs{R}+\abs{B}=N-1\).

    3. Assume inductively that the theorem holds for every pair ofnonnegative integers whose sum is less than \(m+n\). If\[ \abs{R} \geq \binom{m+n-1}{m-1}, \]then the desired red or blue clique exists.

    Choose a subset \[ R_0\subseteq R \] with \[ \abs{R_0} = \binom{m+n-1}{m-1} = \binom{(m-1)+n}{m-1}. \] Apply the induction hypothesis to the complete graph on \(R_0\) with parameters \(m-1\) and \(n\). It contains either a complete red subgraph on \(m\) vertices or a complete blue subgraph on \(n+1\) vertices.

    In the blue case the required blue clique already exists. In the red case, every vertex of that red \(m\)-clique lies in \(R\), so all its edges to \(v\) are red. Adding \(v\) produces a complete red subgraph on \(m+1\) vertices.

    4. Under the same induction hypothesis, if\[ \abs{B} \geq \binom{m+n-1}{m}, \]then the desired red or blue clique exists.

    Choose \[ B_0\subseteq B \] with \[ \abs{B_0} = \binom{m+n-1}{m} = \binom{m+(n-1)}{m}. \] Apply the induction hypothesis with parameters \(m\) and \(n-1\). The complete graph on \(B_0\) contains either a complete red subgraph on \(m+1\) vertices or a complete blue subgraph on \(n\) vertices.

    In the red case the required red clique already exists. In the blue case, all edges from \(v\) to that blue \(n\)-clique are blue because its vertices lie in \(B\). Adding \(v\) produces a complete blue subgraph on \(n+1\) vertices.

    5. The theorem holds for all nonnegative integers \(m,n\).

    Proceed by induction on \(m+n\). Step 1 supplies the boundary cases. For \(m,n>0\), step 2 guarantees that one of the hypotheses of step 3 or step 4 holds, and either step yields the required clique. This completes the induction.

    6. Q.E.D.

    Step 5 gives the asserted red \(K_{m+1}\) or blue \(K_{n+1}\) in every two-coloring of the edges of the specified complete graph.