Search the corpus

    A finitely presented group has finitely many index-3 subgroups

    P-T09B3

    Area
    Topology
    Topics
    Covering Spaces, Groups
    Seen at
    UNL
    Years
    2009
    Status
    draft

    Use covering space theory to prove that any finitely presented group \(G\) has only finitely many subgroups of index \(3\).

    Solution

    Choose a finite presentation \[ G\cong\langle g_1,\ldots,g_n\mid r_1,\ldots,r_m\rangle. \]

    1. There is a connected finite CW complex \(X\) with basepoint \(x_0\) such that\[ \pi_1(X,x_0)\cong G. \]

    Take one \(0\)-cell, attach one oriented \(1\)-cell for each generator \(g_i\), and attach one \(2\)-cell along the loop spelling each relator \(r_j\). The cellular form of the Seifert–van Kampen theorem gives \[ \pi_1(X,x_0) \cong \langle g_1,\ldots,g_n\mid r_1,\ldots,r_m\rangle \cong G. \] This is the presentation complex of the chosen finite presentation.

    2. Every subgroup \(H\le G\) of index \(3\) determines a connected \(3\)-sheeted covering\[ p_H:(\widetilde X_H,\widetilde x_H)\longrightarrow(X,x_0) \]whose associated subgroup is \(H\).

    A CW complex is path-connected, locally path-connected, and semilocally simply connected. Hence the covering-space classification theorem applies to \(X\). Under the identification in 1, the subgroup \(H\le\pi_1(X,x_0)\) corresponds to a connected based covering for which \[ (p_H)_*\pi_1(\widetilde X_H,\widetilde x_H)=H. \] The number of sheets is the subgroup index, so \[ |p_H^{-1}(x_0)|=[G:H]=3. \]

    3. The covering in 2 gives a homomorphism\[ \rho_H:G\longrightarrow S_3 \]such that, after labeling the chosen point \(\widetilde x_H\) of the fiber by \(1\),\[ H=\{g\in G:\rho_H(g)(1)=1\}. \]

    The fundamental group acts by monodromy on the fiber \(p_H^{-1}(x_0)\): a loop at \(x_0\) sends a point of the fiber to the endpoint of its lift beginning at that point. After labeling the three fiber points by \(\{1,2,3\}\) with \(\widetilde x_H\) labeled \(1\), this action is a homomorphism \[ \rho_H:\pi_1(X,x_0)\longrightarrow\operatorname{Sym}(\{1,2,3\})=S_3. \] Using 1, regard it as a homomorphism from \(G\).

    An element \(g\in G\) fixes \(1\) under this action exactly when a representing loop lifts from \(\widetilde x_H\) to a loop ending again at \(\widetilde x_H\). By the lifting criterion for the associated subgroup, this happens exactly when \[ g\in(p_H)_*\pi_1(\widetilde X_H,\widetilde x_H)=H. \] This proves the displayed formula for \(H\).

    4. There are only finitely many homomorphisms\[ G\longrightarrow S_3. \]

    A homomorphism out of \(G\) is determined by the images of the finite generating set \[ g_1,\ldots,g_n. \] Each generator has only \[ |S_3|=6 \] possible images. Thus there are at most \[ 6^n \] possible assignments to the generators, and only some of these satisfy the relators and extend to homomorphisms. Hence the set \(\operatorname{Hom}(G,S_3)\) is finite.

    5. The group \(G\) has only finitely many subgroups of index \(3\).

    By 3, every index-\(3\) subgroup is the inverse image of a point stabilizer in \(S_3\) under a homomorphism \[ \rho:G\to S_3. \] There are only finitely many such homomorphisms by 4, and \(S_3\) has only three point stabilizers in its natural action on \(\{1,2,3\}\). Therefore only finitely many subgroups can arise. In fact the argument gives the crude bound \[ \#\{H\le G:[G:H]=3\}\le 3\cdot6^n. \]