Search the corpus

    Neither diagonalizable nor invertible implies the other

    P-Y6Y6V

    Area
    Algebra
    Topics
    Counterexamples, Diagonalization, Matrices
    Status
    draft

    Does diagonalizable imply invertible? Does invertible imply diagonalizable?

    Solution

    Neither implication holds.

    A diagonalizable matrix need not be invertible. For example, \[ A=\begin{pmatrix}0&0\\0&1\end{pmatrix} \] is already diagonal, but \[ \det A=0, \] so it is not invertible.

    An invertible matrix need not be diagonalizable. For example, \[ B=\begin{pmatrix}1&1\\0&1\end{pmatrix} \] has determinant \(1\), so it is invertible. But its only eigenvalue is \(1\), and \[ \ker(B-I) \] is one-dimensional, so \(B\) does not have a basis of eigenvectors and is not diagonalizable.