Search the corpus

    The theorem on formal functions

    T-COHFF

    For a proper morphism, all infinitesimal thickenings of a fibre recover the completed stalk of its higher direct image.Suggest a slogan

    Let \(f: X \to Y\) be proper with \(Y\) Noetherian, \(\mcf\) coherent on \(X\), and \(y \in Y\) with maximal ideal \(\mfm_y\). Write \(X_n\) for the subscheme cut out by \(\mfm_y^n \OO_X\). Then the completion of the stalk satisfies \[ \hat{\qty{R^i f_* \mcf}_y} \cong \varprojlim_n H^i\qty{X_n, \mcf/\mfm_y^n \mcf} . \]

    The theorem identifies the completed stalk \(\hat{(R^if_*\mcf)_y}\) with the inverse limit of the cohomology groups \(H^i(X_n,\mcf/\mfm_y^n\mcf)\) over all infinitesimal thickenings \(X_n\) of the fibre. Properness is load-bearing and is what makes the inverse limit converge to something algebraic; the statement is false for open immersions.

    Two corollaries are the reason it is on a syllabus. Zariski’s connectedness theorem: if \(f: X \to Y\) is proper with \(f_* \OO_X = \OO_Y\), then every fibre is connected. And the version of Zariski’s main theorem for a birational proper morphism to a normal variety: the fibres are connected, so no fibre breaks into pieces, which is what “no blowing down to two points” means in practice.

    State the theorem on formal functions.
    Deduce Zariski's connectedness theorem.

    Dependencies

    Backlinks

    • T-COHBCSemicontinuity, constancy of $\chi$, and cohomology and base changeuses

    What links to this