(The endomorphism ring inside $\CC$)
Let \(E = \CC/\Lambda\) with \(\Lambda = \Lambda_\tau = \gens{1,\tau}_\ZZ\). Then \[ \operatorname{End}(E, p_0) \iso R_\Lambda \da \ts{ \alpha \in \CC \st \alpha \Lambda \subseteq \Lambda } , \] the isomorphism carrying an endomorphism to the scalar it is, and carrying \([n]\) to the integer \(n\). Say \(E\) has complex multiplication when \(R_\Lambda \supsetneq \ZZ\). This happens exactly when \(\tau\) is imaginary quadratic, that is \(\tau \in K \da \QQ(\sqrt{-d})\) for some squarefree \(d > 0\), and in that case \[ \ZZ \subsetneq R_\Lambda \subseteq \OO_K \] is an order: a subring of finite index in the ring of integers. Concretely, if \(A\tau^2 + B\tau + C = 0\) with \(A, B, C \in \ZZ\), \(A > 0\) and \(\gcd(A,B,C) = 1\), then \[ R_{\Lambda_\tau} = \ZZ[A\tau], \qquad \disc = B^2 - 4AC = f^2 d_K , \] where \(f = [\OO_K : R_{\Lambda_\tau}]\) is the conductor of the order.
(The three standard computations)
\(\tau = i\). Here \(\tau^2 + 1 = 0\), so \(A = 1\) and \(R = \ZZ[i] = \OO_K\) for \(K = \QQ(i)\), the maximal order, conductor \(1\). Its unit group is \(\ts{\pm 1, \pm i} \cong C_4\), so \(\abs{\Aut(E,p_0)} = 4\), which is the \(j = 1728\) row of the automorphism count; the curve is \(y^2 = x^3 - ax\) for some \(a\).
\(\tau = \rho \da e^{2\pi i/3}\). Here \(\tau^2 + \tau + 1 = 0\), so \(A = 1\) and \(R = \ZZ[\rho] = \OO_K\) for \(K = \QQ(\sqrt{-3})\), conductor \(1\). Its unit group is the sixth roots of unity, \(\cong C_6\), so \(\abs{\Aut(E,p_0)} = 6\), which is the \(j = 0\) row; the curve is \(y^2 = x^3 - b\) for some \(b\).
\(\tau = 2i\). Here \(\tau^2 + 4 = 0\), so \(A = 1\) and \(R = \ZZ[2i] = \ZZ + 2\ZZ[i]\), of index \(2\) in \(\ZZ[i]\): an order of conductor \(2\) in \(K = \QQ(i)\), with discriminant \(-16 = 2^2 \cdot (-4)\). Its unit group is only \(\ts{\pm 1}\), so this curve has just the two automorphisms every elliptic curve has, and \(j(2i) \neq 0, 1728\). Thus the endomorphism ring need not be the full ring of integers of the imaginary quadratic field.
The realization inside \(\CC\) identifies endomorphisms with lattice-preserving scalars in both directions. Given \(\alpha\) with \(\alpha\Lambda \subseteq \Lambda\), multiplication by \(\alpha\) descends to a holomorphic endomorphism of \(\CC/\Lambda\) fixing \(0\), which is algebraic by GAGA. Conversely a holomorphic map \(\CC/\Lambda \to \CC/\Lambda\) fixing \(0\) lifts to an entire map of \(\CC\) fixing \(0\) and commuting with \(\Lambda\)-translation, whose derivative is \(\Lambda\)-periodic and therefore constant; so the lift is \(z \mapsto \alpha z\). Addition of endomorphisms becomes addition of scalars and composition becomes multiplication, so the identification is a ring isomorphism, not just a bijection.
Why the dichotomy is sharp: \(R_\Lambda \subseteq \Lambda\) because \(\alpha = \alpha \cdot 1 \in \Lambda\), so \(R_\Lambda\) is a rank-one or rank-two subgroup of \(\Lambda \cong \ZZ^2\) closed under multiplication. Rank one is \(\ZZ\). Rank two means some \(\alpha \notin \RR\) satisfies a monic-after-clearing integral quadratic, and since \(\alpha^2 \in R_\Lambda\) is an integer combination of \(1\) and \(\alpha\), that quadratic has no real root; writing \(\alpha = a + b\tau\) with \(b \neq 0\) then puts \(\tau\) in the same imaginary quadratic field. There is no intermediate case, and in particular the endomorphism ring of an elliptic curve over \(\CC\) is never an order in a quaternion algebra — that happens only for supersingular curves in characteristic \(p\).
Complex multiplication is decided by the lattice parameter \(\tau\), and only countably many \(\tau\) are imaginary quadratic, so only countably many \(j \in \CC\) are CM \(j\)-invariants; the generic curve has \(\operatorname{End} = \ZZ\). That still leaves it hard to decide for a given equation, because passing from an equation to \(\tau\) requires transcendental data. The route that does work is class field theory.
Dependencies
T-CRVUNIFEvery elliptic curve over $\CC$ is a torus $\CC/\Lambda$uses
Backlinks
D-CRVHASSEThe Hasse invariant, and ordinary versus supersingularrelated-toFE-CRVSSPRIMESFixing the curve and varying $p$, and the density of supersingular primesusesT-CRVCMCFTFor a CM curve, $j$ is an algebraic integer and $K(j)/K$ is abelian of degree $h(R)$uses