Search the corpus

    The Hasse invariant criterion and the Hasse polynomial $h_p(\lambda)$

    T-CRVHASSE

    Supersingularity is a coefficient test: extract $(xyz)^{p-1}$ from $f^{p-1}$, or solve $h_p(\lambda)=0$ in Legendre form.Suggest a slogan

    (The coefficient criterion)

    Let \(\operatorname{ch} k = p > 0\) and let \(E = V(f) \subseteq \PP^2\) be a smooth cubic, \(f\) homogeneous of degree \(3\). Then \(E\) has Hasse invariant zero, that is \(E\) is supersingular, if and only if \[ \text{the coefficient of } (xyz)^{p-1} \text{ in } f^{p-1} \text{ is } 0 . \]

    (The Legendre family)

    For \(p \neq 2\) and \(E \colon y^2 = x(x-1)(x-\lambda)\) with \(\lambda \neq 0,1\), put \(m \da \tfrac{p-1}{2}\) and \[ h_p(\lambda) \da \sum_{i=0}^{m} \binom{m}{i}^2 \lambda^i . \] Then \(E\) is supersingular exactly when \(h_p(\lambda) = 0\). Consequently, for each \(p\) there are at most \(\left\lfloor p/12 \right\rfloor + 2\) supersingular elliptic curves over \(\bar k\) up to isomorphism.

    (Where the criterion comes from)

    Each step in the coefficient criterion is forced by the cohomological realization below.

    The ideal sheaf of a plane cubic is \(\OO_{\PP^2}(-3)\), so \[ 0 \to \OO_{\PP^2}(-3) \xrightarrow{\ f\ } \OO_{\PP^2} \to \OO_E \to 0 . \] Since \(h^1(\OO_{\PP^2}) = h^2(\OO_{\PP^2}) = 0\), the long exact sequence gives \(H^1(\OO_E) \iso H^2(\PP^2; \OO(-3))\). That group is one-dimensional with basis the Čech class \(\tfrac{1}{xyz}\) — it is the unique monomial of degree \(-3\) with all three exponents negative. So the line whose endomorphism is being tested has a canonical monomial basis, and the test becomes a computation with monomials.

    Frobenius on \(\PP^2\) sends \(\tfrac{1}{xyz} \mapsto \tfrac{1}{(xyz)^p}\). Transporting along the diagram that compares \(E = V(f)\) with \(V(f^p)\) multiplies by \(f^{p-1}\), so the image is the class of \[ \frac{f^{p-1}}{(xyz)^{p}} . \] In \(H^2(\PP^2; \OO(-3))\) every monomial with a non-negative exponent is zero, so only the term of \(f^{p-1}\) equal to \((xyz)^{p-1}\) survives, and it contributes that coefficient times \(\tfrac{1}{xyz}\). The criterion is then the definition read off: \(F^* = 0\) exactly when that coefficient vanishes.

    The degree bookkeeping explains why the distinguished monomial can occur: both \(f^{p-1}\) and \((xyz)^{p-1}\) have degree \(3(p-1)\).

    (Using the Legendre form)

    Dehomogenising, the criterion for \(y^2 = g(x)\) with \(\deg g = 3\) becomes: supersingular exactly when the coefficient of \(x^{p-1}\) in \(g(x)^{(p-1)/2}\) vanishes. Expanding \(\big(x(x-1)(x-\lambda)\big)^m\) and collecting gives \((-1)^m h_p(\lambda)\), so the sign is irrelevant and the vanishing is \(h_p(\lambda) = 0\).

    Two low-characteristic checks are:

    • \(p = 3\): \(m = 1\), \(h_3(\lambda) = 1 + \lambda\), so \(\lambda = -1\), and there \(\lambda^2 - \lambda + 1 = 3 = 0\), giving \(j = 0\) — the one supersingular curve in characteristic \(3\).

    • \(p = 5\): \(m = 2\), \(h_5(\lambda) = \lambda^2 + 4\lambda + 1\), whose roots lie in \(\FF_{25}\) and satisfy \(\lambda^2 - \lambda + 1 = -5\lambda = 0\), again giving \(j = 0\).

    The count follows because \(h_p\) has degree \(m = \tfrac{p-1}{2}\) and the map \(\lambda \mapsto j\) is generically six-to-one, so the supersingular \(j\)-values number about \(p/12\); the exact count is \(\left\lfloor p/12 \right\rfloor\) adjusted by \(0, 1, 1, 2\) according to \(p \equiv 1, 5, 7, 11 \bmod 12\), which the stated bound covers. Supersingular curves therefore exist for every \(p\) and are always finite in number; \(h_p\) has simple roots, so no value of \(\lambda\) is counted twice.

    Given a plane cubic in characteristic $p$, how do you compute its Hasse invariant?
    Write down the Hasse polynomial for the Legendre family.
    Why does the criterion involve $f^{p-1}$ and the monomial $(xyz)^{p-1}$?
    How many supersingular curves are there in characteristic $p$?

    Dependencies

    • D-CRVHASSEThe Hasse invariant, and ordinary versus supersingularuses
    • T-IJW1KThe cohomology of $\OO_{\PP^n}(d)$uses

    Backlinks

    • FE-CRVSSPRIMESFixing the curve and varying $p$, and the density of supersingular primesuses

    What links to this