Search the corpus

    The standard adjoint pairs

    T-DEFADJPR

    Adjunction predicts exactness: left adjoints are right exact, right adjoints are left exact, and open restriction is both, hence exact.Suggest a slogan

    (useful adjoint pairs)

    The left adjoint is named first in each pair.

    • “-ify” and “forget”: free group on a set and the underlying set; sheafification and the inclusion of sheaves into presheaves; \(\widetilde{\wait}\) from \(\Gamma(X,\OO_X)\)-modules to \(\OO_X\)-modules and global sections.

    • Tensor \(\wait \tensor_A N\) and \(\Hom_A(N,\wait)\), as functors \(\mods{A} \to \mods{A}\) for a fixed \(A\)-module \(N\).

    • Inverse image \(\pi^{-1}\) and pushforward \(\pi_*\), between sheaves on \(X\) and sheaves on \(Y\), for a fixed \(\pi: X \to Y\).

    • Pullback \(\pi^*\) and pushforward \(\pi_*\), between \(\OO_X\)-modules and \(\OO_Y\)-modules.

    • Extension by zero \(i_!\) and inverse image \(i^{-1}\), for an open immersion \(i: U \injects X\).

    By RAPL and LAPC each left adjoint here is right exact and each right adjoint left exact, so the list doubles as a table of which functors have interesting derived functors: \(R^i\pi_*\) for pushforward, \(\Tor\) for tensor, \(\Ext\) for \(\Hom\).

    The last pair is the one with a surprise in it. For an open immersion, \(i^{-1}\) is a right adjoint (of \(i_!\)) and a left adjoint (of \(i_*\)) at the same time, so it is exact — which is why restricting a short exact sequence of sheaves to an open set keeps it exact, and why exactness of sheaves may be checked on any open cover or on stalks.

    List the adjoint pairs used constantly in algebraic geometry, saying which functor is the left adjoint.
    Why is $i^{-1}$ exact for an open immersion $i$?

    Dependencies

    • D-DEFADJAdjoint functorsuses
    • T-DEFRAPLRAPL and LAPC, and the exactness of $\Hom$ and $\tensor$uses