Search the corpus

    Coherent sheaves on projective space have finite resolutions by twists

    T-MODRES

    Every coherent sheaf on $\PP^n$ is built from finitely many twists $\OO(-d)$, in a resolution of length at most $n$.Suggest a slogan

    Every coherent \(\mcf\) on \(\PP^n_k\) admits a finite resolution \[ 0 \to \mce_m \to \cdots \to \mce_1 \to \mce_0 \to \mcf \to 0 \] with each \(\mce_j\) a finite direct sum of twists \(\OO(-d)\), and one may take \(m \leq n\).

    Serre’s theorem A supplies the surjection \(\mce_0 \surjects \mcf\); iterating it on the kernel gives a possibly infinite resolution, and the Hilbert syzygy theorem for \(k[x_0,\dots,x_n]\) is what truncates it. So the statement is a graded-module theorem read through \(\tilde{\wait\,}\), and its length bound is the global dimension \(n+1\) of the polynomial ring, dropping by one on passage to \(\Proj\).

    This is the standard device for reducing any additive invariant of coherent sheaves to the twists. Cohomology, the Euler characteristic, and the Hilbert polynomial are all computed this way: break the resolution into short exact sequences, apply the known values on \(\OO(d)\), and alternate signs. It is also why \(K_0(\PP^n) \cong \ZZ^{n+1}\), generated by the classes of the twists.

    How do you resolve a coherent sheaf on $\PP^n$?
    How long can the resolution be taken to be?
    What is this used for?

    Dependencies

    • T-MODSERRESerre's theorems A and Buses
    • D-CB9XSThe twisting sheaves $\OO(n)$, and $\Pic(\PP^n) = \ZZ$uses

    Backlinks

    What links to this