Every coherent \(\mcf\) on \(\PP^n_k\) admits a finite resolution \[ 0 \to \mce_m \to \cdots \to \mce_1 \to \mce_0 \to \mcf \to 0 \] with each \(\mce_j\) a finite direct sum of twists \(\OO(-d)\), and one may take \(m \leq n\).
Serre’s theorem A supplies the surjection \(\mce_0 \surjects \mcf\); iterating it on the kernel gives a possibly infinite resolution, and the Hilbert syzygy theorem for \(k[x_0,\dots,x_n]\) is what truncates it. So the statement is a graded-module theorem read through \(\tilde{\wait\,}\), and its length bound is the global dimension \(n+1\) of the polynomial ring, dropping by one on passage to \(\Proj\).
This is the standard device for reducing any additive invariant of coherent sheaves to the twists. Cohomology, the Euler characteristic, and the Hilbert polynomial are all computed this way: break the resolution into short exact sequences, apply the known values on \(\OO(d)\), and alternate signs. It is also why \(K_0(\PP^n) \cong \ZZ^{n+1}\), generated by the classes of the twists.
Dependencies
T-MODSERRESerre's theorems A and BusesD-CB9XSThe twisting sheaves $\OO(n)$, and $\Pic(\PP^n) = \ZZ$uses
Backlinks
D-COHDEVISSAGEDévissage of coherent sheavesrelated-to