Search the corpus

    Kodaira dimension and the Enriques classification of surfaces

    T-SRFKOD

    Kodaira dimension measures how much the pluricanonical system sees: nothing, a point, a curve, or the whole surface for $\kappa=-\infty,0,1,2$.Suggest a slogan

    The Kodaira dimension of a smooth projective variety \(X\) is \[ \kappa(X) = \operatorname{trdeg}_k \bigoplus_{n \geq 0} H^0(X, \OO_X(nK_X)) - 1 , \] set to \(-\infty\) when every plurigenus vanishes. It is a birational invariant, so for surfaces it is computed on a minimal model.

    (Zariski desingularization of surfaces)

    Every projective surface \(Y\) admits a desingularization by a finite sequence that alternates normalizations and blowups of maximal ideals. The resulting smooth surface is projective.

    (Minimal resolution of normal surface singularities)

    Let \(Y\) be a normal projective surface. There exists a unique minimal resolution \(\varphi \colon X \to Y\) such that \(X\) is smooth projective, \(\varphi\) is an isomorphism over \(\reg Y\), and every other desingularization \(\varphi' \colon X' \to Y\) with the same two properties factors as \(\varphi' = \varphi \circ \sigma\) where \(\sigma \colon X' \to X\) is a composition of blowups of points over the exceptional locus of \(\varphi\).

    (Enriques classification)

    A minimal smooth projective surface \(X\) over \(\CC\) falls into exactly one of:

    • \(\kappa(X) = -\infty\) iff \(|12K_X| = \varnothing\) iff \(X\) is \(\PP^2\) or a minimal ruled surface;

    • \(\kappa(X) = 0\) iff \(|12K_X| = \{0\}\) iff \(X\) is K3, Enriques, abelian, or bielliptic;

    • \(\kappa(X) = 1\) iff \(X\) is a properly elliptic surface;

    • \(\kappa(X) = 2\) iff \(X\) is of general type.

    In particular \(\kappa = -\infty\) are the rational and ruled surfaces, \(\kappa = 0\) are the four classes above, \(\kappa = 1\) are elliptic, and \(\kappa = 2\) are general type.

    The organising idea is that \(\kappa\) measures how much of the surface the pluricanonical systems can see: nothing at \(-\infty\), a point at \(0\), a curve at \(1\), the whole surface at \(2\). For curves the same invariant gives the trichotomy \(g=0\), \(g=1\), \(g \geq 2\), and the surface classification is its two-dimensional analogue.

    The \(\kappa = 0\) row is the one to be able to separate, by \((p_g, q)\): K3 has \((1,0)\) with \(K \sim 0\) and simply connected; Enriques has \((0,0)\) with \(2K \sim 0\), and is a free quotient of a K3 by an involution; abelian has \((1,2)\); bielliptic has \((0,1)\) and is a quotient of a product of elliptic curves.

    Minimality is what makes the statement clean, and blowing up is exactly the operation that leaves \(\kappa\) alone while changing \(K^2\) — which is why the classification is stated for minimal models and read off as a birational statement.

    Over an algebraically closed field of characteristic \(p > 0\) the classification of Bombieri and Mumford has the same four values of \(\kappa\), but the \(\kappa = 0\) and \(\kappa = 1\) classes change: in characteristic \(2\) and \(3\) there are quasi-hyperelliptic surfaces and quasi-elliptic fibrations, and in characteristic \(2\) there are non-classical Enriques surfaces with \(h^1(\OO_X) = 1\). So the list above is a theorem for complex surfaces, equivalently for surfaces over an algebraically closed field of characteristic \(0\).

    Discuss the classification of surfaces.
    What is the Kodaira dimension?
    Which surfaces have Kodaira dimension zero?

    Dependencies

    • T-SRFCASTCastelnuovo's contractibility criterionuses
    • D-SRFRULEDRational and ruled surfaces, and the Hirzebruch surfacesuses

    Backlinks

    What links to this