Tag 0138

\(\langle 2 \rangle \oplus A_{1}(-1)^{10}\)

<2> + A1(-1)^10·(r, a, delta) = (11, 11, 1)

Invariants

Rank11
Signature \((n_+, n_-)\)(1, 10)
Determinant\(2048\)

Gram tensor

The components \(b(e_i, e_j)\) of the Gram tensor \(b\) in the chosen basis \(e_{1}, \dots, e_{11}\).

In this basis, \(L = {}\)\(\mathbb{Z}\{e_{1}\}\) \(\oplus\) \(\mathbb{Z}\{e_{2}\}\) \(\oplus\) \(\mathbb{Z}\{e_{3}\}\) \(\oplus\) \(\mathbb{Z}\{e_{4}\}\) \(\oplus\) \(\mathbb{Z}\{e_{5}\}\) \(\oplus\) \(\mathbb{Z}\{e_{6}\}\) \(\oplus\) \(\mathbb{Z}\{e_{7}\}\) \(\oplus\) \(\mathbb{Z}\{e_{8}\}\) \(\oplus\) \(\mathbb{Z}\{e_{9}\}\) \(\oplus\) \(\mathbb{Z}\{e_{10}\}\) \(\oplus\) \(\mathbb{Z}\{e_{11}\}\), an orthogonal sum.

\(e_{1}\)\(e_{2}\)\(e_{3}\)\(e_{4}\)\(e_{5}\)\(e_{6}\)\(e_{7}\)\(e_{8}\)\(e_{9}\)\(e_{10}\)\(e_{11}\)
\(e_{1}\)20000000000
\(e_{2}\)0-2000000000
\(e_{3}\)00-200000000
\(e_{4}\)000-20000000
\(e_{5}\)0000-2000000
\(e_{6}\)00000-200000
\(e_{7}\)000000-20000
\(e_{8}\)0000000-2000
\(e_{9}\)00000000-200
\(e_{10}\)000000000-20
\(e_{11}\)0000000000-2
[[2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, -2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, -2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, -2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, -2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, -2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, -2, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, -2, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, -2, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, -2, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, -2]]

Integral lattice

Parityeven
Discriminant group\((\mathbb{Z}/2)^{11}\)
Unimodularno
Integral overlattices \(L \subseteq M \subseteq L^*\)not decided
Nikulin invariants \((r, a, \delta)\)\((11, 11, 1)\)
Primes of bad reduction \(\Sigma_L = \{p \mid 2 \det L\}\)\(\{2\}\)
Zeta function of the cone \(X_0 : Q(x) = 0\), \(\Sigma = \Sigma_L\)\(\zeta^\Sigma(X_0, s) = \zeta^\Sigma(s - 10)\)
Zeta function of \(X_n : Q(x) = n\), \(n \neq 0\), \(\Sigma = \Sigma_L \cup \{p \mid n\}\)\(\zeta^\Sigma(X_n, s) = \zeta^\Sigma(s - 10)\, L^\Sigma(s - 5, \chi_{-2048n})\)
Genus symbol\(\mathrm{II}_{1,10}\ \bigl(2\colon [2^{11}]_{7}\bigr)\)
Class number of the genus1

Indefinite lattice

Isotropicyes

Hyperbolic lattice

Reflectiveyes declared

Roots

Root lattice: \(L = \mathbb{Z}\Phi(L)\)yes
\(L = \mathbb{Z}\Phi_S(L)\) for\(S = \{-2, 2\}\)
\(R(L) = \mathbb{Z}\Phi(L)\)\(L\)
Rank of \(R(L)\)11
\([L : R(L)]\)1
\(R(L)\) is primitive in \(L\)yes
ProofEach \(r_i\) in roots that generate \(\mathbb{Z}\Phi(L)\) is a root, and the \(r_i\) generate \(L\).

Roots that generate \(\mathbb{Z}\Phi(L)\)

The \(r_i\) are a basis of \(L\).

RootCoordinates\(b(r, r)\)
\(r_{1}\)\(e_{1}\)\(2\)
\(r_{2}\)\(e_{2}\)\(-2\)
\(r_{3}\)\(e_{3}\)\(-2\)
\(r_{4}\)\(e_{4}\)\(-2\)
\(r_{5}\)\(e_{5}\)\(-2\)
\(r_{6}\)\(e_{6}\)\(-2\)
\(r_{7}\)\(e_{7}\)\(-2\)
\(r_{8}\)\(e_{8}\)\(-2\)
\(r_{9}\)\(e_{9}\)\(-2\)
\(r_{10}\)\(e_{10}\)\(-2\)
\(r_{11}\)\(e_{11}\)\(-2\)

Notes

This is the even hyperbolic 2-elementary lattice with invariants \((r, a, \delta) = (11, 11, 1)\).

Since \(a = r\), \(L^* = \tfrac{1}{2} L\), and \(L\) is the twist \(M(2)\) of the unimodular lattice \(M = \mathrm{I}_{1,10}\), the record 0139. The corpus records a twist \(M(n)\), \(|n| \geq 2\), only for the 13 rows \(a = r\) of Nikulin’s table, because the classification names the twist and not \(M\).

Nikulin lists it in Table 1 of Factor groups of groups of automorphisms of hyperbolic forms with respect to subgroups generated by 2-reflections (1983), the table of the even hyperbolic lattices \(L\) with \(2 A_L = 0\) that have a primitive embedding in the K3 lattice. These are the invariant lattices of the nonsymplectic involutions of K3 surfaces (Remark 4.5.3), and Theorem 4.3.2 states that \((r, a, \delta)\) determines each of them.

Its invariants satisfy \(r + a = 22\), and it is reflective (Alexeev, Theorem 1.1).

\(\langle a \rangle\) is the lattice of rank 1 with basis \(e\) and \(b(e, e) = a\), and \(A_1(-1) = \langle -2 \rangle\). The basis of an orthogonal sum is the union of the bases of the summands, in the order written.

Morphisms

References

  1. V. V. Nikulin, "Factor groups of groups of automorphisms of hyperbolic forms with respect to subgroups generated by 2-reflections. Algebrogeometric applications", J. Soviet Math. 22 (1983), 1401-1475, §4, Table 1 and Theorem 4.3.2. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01094757
  2. V. Alexeev, "Reflective hyperbolic 2-elementary lattices, K3 surfaces and hyperkahler manifolds", arXiv:2209.09110v4, Theorem 1.1. https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.09110v4