Tag 029J
\(U \oplus U(2) \oplus E_{8}(-2)\)
U + U(2) + E8(-2)·Enriques period lattice
Invariants
| Rank | 12 |
|---|---|
| Signature \((n_+, n_-)\) | (2, 10) |
| Determinant | \(1024\) |
Gram tensor
The components \(b(e_i, e_j)\) of the Gram tensor \(b\) in the chosen basis \(e_{1}, \dots, e_{12}\).
In this basis, \(L = {}\)\(\mathbb{Z}\{e_{1}, e_{2}\}\) \(\oplus\) \(\mathbb{Z}\{e_{3}, e_{4}\}\) \(\oplus\) \(\mathbb{Z}\{e_{5}, \dots, e_{12}\}\), an orthogonal sum.
| \(e_{1}\) | \(e_{2}\) | \(e_{3}\) | \(e_{4}\) | \(e_{5}\) | \(e_{6}\) | \(e_{7}\) | \(e_{8}\) | \(e_{9}\) | \(e_{10}\) | \(e_{11}\) | \(e_{12}\) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| \(e_{1}\) | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| \(e_{2}\) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| \(e_{3}\) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| \(e_{4}\) | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| \(e_{5}\) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| \(e_{6}\) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| \(e_{7}\) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | -4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| \(e_{8}\) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | -4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| \(e_{9}\) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | -4 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| \(e_{10}\) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | -4 | 2 | 0 |
| \(e_{11}\) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | -4 | 2 |
| \(e_{12}\) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | -4 |
[[0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, -4, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, -4, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, -4, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 2, -4, 2, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, -4, 2, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, -4, 2, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, -4, 2], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, -4]]
Integral lattice
| Parity | even |
|---|---|
| Discriminant group | \((\mathbb{Z}/2)^{10}\) |
| Unimodular | no |
| Integral overlattices \(L \subseteq M \subseteq L^*\) | not decided |
| Nikulin invariants \((r, a, \delta)\) | \((12, 10, 0)\) |
| Primes of bad reduction \(\Sigma_L = \{p \mid 2 \det L\}\) | \(\{2\}\) |
| Character of the discriminant \(\chi_D\), \(D = (-1)^{6} \det L\) | trivial |
| Zeta function of the cone \(X_0 : Q(x) = 0\), \(\Sigma = \Sigma_L\) | \(\zeta^\Sigma(X_0, s) = \frac{\zeta^\Sigma(s - 11)\, \zeta^\Sigma(s - 6)}{\zeta^\Sigma(s - 5)}\) |
| Zeta function of \(X_n : Q(x) = n\), \(n \neq 0\), \(\Sigma = \Sigma_L \cup \{p \mid n\}\) | \(\zeta^\Sigma(X_n, s) = \frac{\zeta^\Sigma(s - 11)}{\zeta^\Sigma(s - 5)}\) |
| Hyperbolic index \(\max\{n : L \cong U^n \oplus L'\}\) | \(\geq 1\), by an embedding of \(U^{1}\) in the morphism files |
Indefinite lattice
| Isotropic | yes |
|---|
Roots
| Root lattice: \(L = \mathbb{Z}\Phi(L)\) | no |
|---|---|
| \(R(L) = \mathbb{Z}\Phi(L)\) | isometry class not decided |
| Rank of \(R(L)\) | 12 |
| \([L : R(L)]\) | 2 |
| \(R(L)\) is primitive in \(L\) | no: \(L / R(L) \cong \mathbb{Z}/2\) |
| Proof | Each \(r_i\) in roots that generate \(\mathbb{Z}\Phi(L)\) is a root. The notes prove that each root of \(L\) is in \(\mathbb{Z}\{r_i\}\). |
Roots that generate \(\mathbb{Z}\Phi(L)\)
| Root | Coordinates | \(b(r, r)\) |
|---|---|---|
| \(r_{1}\) | \(e_{1} + e_{2}\) | \(2\) |
| \(r_{2}\) | \(e_{1} - e_{2}\) | \(-2\) |
| \(r_{3}\) | \(e_{1} + e_{2} + e_{3}\) | \(2\) |
| \(r_{4}\) | \(e_{1} + e_{2} + e_{4}\) | \(2\) |
| \(r_{5}\) | \(e_{5}\) | \(-4\) |
| \(r_{6}\) | \(e_{6}\) | \(-4\) |
| \(r_{7}\) | \(e_{7}\) | \(-4\) |
| \(r_{8}\) | \(e_{8}\) | \(-4\) |
| \(r_{9}\) | \(e_{9}\) | \(-4\) |
| \(r_{10}\) | \(e_{10}\) | \(-4\) |
| \(r_{11}\) | \(e_{11}\) | \(-4\) |
| \(r_{12}\) | \(e_{12}\) | \(-4\) |
Notes
For an Enriques surface \(S\) with K3 cover \(\tilde S\), the covering involution acts on \(H^2(\tilde S, \mathbb{Z}) \cong E_8(-1)^2 \oplus U^3\) with invariant lattice \(M \cong E_8(-2) \oplus U(2)\); the anti-invariant lattice \(N = M^\perp \cong E_8(-2) \oplus U(2) \oplus U\), of signature \((2, 10)\), is the period lattice of Enriques surfaces (Allcock). Allcock (Lemma 1) shows that \(\mathrm{Aut}(N) \cong \mathrm{Aut}(I_{2,10})\).
Roots: write \(r = a e_{1} + c e_{2} + w\) with \(w\) in the span \(W\) of \(e_{3}, \dots, e_{12}\). \(b(e_{1}, e_{2}) = 1\) is odd, \(W\) is orthogonal to \(e_{1}\) and \(e_{2}\), and \(b(w, w) \in 4\mathbb{Z}\) for \(w\) in \(W\), because the Gram tensor of \(W\) has its diagonal components in \(4\mathbb{Z}\) and the others in \(2\mathbb{Z}\). So \(b(r, e_{2}) = a\), \(b(r, e_{1}) = c\) and \(b(r, r) = 2 a c + b(w, w)\). If \(a\) is odd and \(c\) is even, then \(b(r, r) \equiv 0 \bmod 4\), and \(b(r, r)\) divides \(2 b(r, e_{2}) = 2 a \equiv 2 \bmod 4\), which is impossible; the same holds with \(a\) and \(c\) exchanged. Each root is therefore in \(L' = \{a \equiv c \bmod 2\}\), which has index 2 in \(L\). \(e_{1} + e_{2}\), \(e_{1} + e_{2} + e_{3}\) and \(e_{1} + e_{2} + e_{4}\) have \(b(r, r) = 2\) and \(b(r, L) = \mathbb{Z}\), and \(2\) divides \(2\). \(e_{1} - e_{2}\) has \(b(r, r) = -2\) and \(b(r, L) = \mathbb{Z}\), and \(-2\) divides \(2\). \(e_{5}\), \(e_{6}\), \(e_{7}\), \(e_{8}\), \(e_{9}\), \(e_{10}\), \(e_{11}\) and \(e_{12}\) have \(b(r, r) = -4\) and \(b(r, L) = 2\mathbb{Z}\), and \(-4\) divides \(4\). These roots are in \(L'\), and their invariant factors in \(L\) are \(1, \dots, 1, 2\), so they generate \(L'\): \(\mathbb{Z}\Phi(L) = L'\), of index 2 in \(L\).
Morphisms
References
- D. Allcock, "The period lattice for Enriques surfaces", arXiv:math/9905166, the introduction and Lemma 1.