Tag 029J

\(U \oplus U(2) \oplus E_{8}(-2)\)

U + U(2) + E8(-2)·Enriques period lattice

Invariants

Rank12
Signature \((n_+, n_-)\)(2, 10)
Determinant\(1024\)

Gram tensor

The components \(b(e_i, e_j)\) of the Gram tensor \(b\) in the chosen basis \(e_{1}, \dots, e_{12}\).

In this basis, \(L = {}\)\(\mathbb{Z}\{e_{1}, e_{2}\}\) \(\oplus\) \(\mathbb{Z}\{e_{3}, e_{4}\}\) \(\oplus\) \(\mathbb{Z}\{e_{5}, \dots, e_{12}\}\), an orthogonal sum.

\(e_{1}\)\(e_{2}\)\(e_{3}\)\(e_{4}\)\(e_{5}\)\(e_{6}\)\(e_{7}\)\(e_{8}\)\(e_{9}\)\(e_{10}\)\(e_{11}\)\(e_{12}\)
\(e_{1}\)010000000000
\(e_{2}\)100000000000
\(e_{3}\)000200000000
\(e_{4}\)002000000000
\(e_{5}\)0000-40200000
\(e_{6}\)00000-4020000
\(e_{7}\)000020-420000
\(e_{8}\)0000022-42000
\(e_{9}\)00000002-4200
\(e_{10}\)000000002-420
\(e_{11}\)0000000002-42
\(e_{12}\)00000000002-4
[[0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, -4, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, -4, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, -4, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 2, -4, 2, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, -4, 2, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, -4, 2, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, -4, 2], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, -4]]

Integral lattice

Parityeven
Discriminant group\((\mathbb{Z}/2)^{10}\)
Unimodularno
Integral overlattices \(L \subseteq M \subseteq L^*\)not decided
Nikulin invariants \((r, a, \delta)\)\((12, 10, 0)\)
Primes of bad reduction \(\Sigma_L = \{p \mid 2 \det L\}\)\(\{2\}\)
Character of the discriminant \(\chi_D\), \(D = (-1)^{6} \det L\)trivial
Zeta function of the cone \(X_0 : Q(x) = 0\), \(\Sigma = \Sigma_L\)\(\zeta^\Sigma(X_0, s) = \frac{\zeta^\Sigma(s - 11)\, \zeta^\Sigma(s - 6)}{\zeta^\Sigma(s - 5)}\)
Zeta function of \(X_n : Q(x) = n\), \(n \neq 0\), \(\Sigma = \Sigma_L \cup \{p \mid n\}\)\(\zeta^\Sigma(X_n, s) = \frac{\zeta^\Sigma(s - 11)}{\zeta^\Sigma(s - 5)}\)
Hyperbolic index \(\max\{n : L \cong U^n \oplus L'\}\)\(\geq 1\), by an embedding of \(U^{1}\) in the morphism files

Indefinite lattice

Isotropicyes

Roots

Root lattice: \(L = \mathbb{Z}\Phi(L)\)no
\(R(L) = \mathbb{Z}\Phi(L)\)isometry class not decided
Rank of \(R(L)\)12
\([L : R(L)]\)2
\(R(L)\) is primitive in \(L\)no: \(L / R(L) \cong \mathbb{Z}/2\)
ProofEach \(r_i\) in roots that generate \(\mathbb{Z}\Phi(L)\) is a root. The notes prove that each root of \(L\) is in \(\mathbb{Z}\{r_i\}\).

Roots that generate \(\mathbb{Z}\Phi(L)\)

RootCoordinates\(b(r, r)\)
\(r_{1}\)\(e_{1} + e_{2}\)\(2\)
\(r_{2}\)\(e_{1} - e_{2}\)\(-2\)
\(r_{3}\)\(e_{1} + e_{2} + e_{3}\)\(2\)
\(r_{4}\)\(e_{1} + e_{2} + e_{4}\)\(2\)
\(r_{5}\)\(e_{5}\)\(-4\)
\(r_{6}\)\(e_{6}\)\(-4\)
\(r_{7}\)\(e_{7}\)\(-4\)
\(r_{8}\)\(e_{8}\)\(-4\)
\(r_{9}\)\(e_{9}\)\(-4\)
\(r_{10}\)\(e_{10}\)\(-4\)
\(r_{11}\)\(e_{11}\)\(-4\)
\(r_{12}\)\(e_{12}\)\(-4\)

Notes

For an Enriques surface \(S\) with K3 cover \(\tilde S\), the covering involution acts on \(H^2(\tilde S, \mathbb{Z}) \cong E_8(-1)^2 \oplus U^3\) with invariant lattice \(M \cong E_8(-2) \oplus U(2)\); the anti-invariant lattice \(N = M^\perp \cong E_8(-2) \oplus U(2) \oplus U\), of signature \((2, 10)\), is the period lattice of Enriques surfaces (Allcock). Allcock (Lemma 1) shows that \(\mathrm{Aut}(N) \cong \mathrm{Aut}(I_{2,10})\).

Roots: write \(r = a e_{1} + c e_{2} + w\) with \(w\) in the span \(W\) of \(e_{3}, \dots, e_{12}\). \(b(e_{1}, e_{2}) = 1\) is odd, \(W\) is orthogonal to \(e_{1}\) and \(e_{2}\), and \(b(w, w) \in 4\mathbb{Z}\) for \(w\) in \(W\), because the Gram tensor of \(W\) has its diagonal components in \(4\mathbb{Z}\) and the others in \(2\mathbb{Z}\). So \(b(r, e_{2}) = a\), \(b(r, e_{1}) = c\) and \(b(r, r) = 2 a c + b(w, w)\). If \(a\) is odd and \(c\) is even, then \(b(r, r) \equiv 0 \bmod 4\), and \(b(r, r)\) divides \(2 b(r, e_{2}) = 2 a \equiv 2 \bmod 4\), which is impossible; the same holds with \(a\) and \(c\) exchanged. Each root is therefore in \(L' = \{a \equiv c \bmod 2\}\), which has index 2 in \(L\). \(e_{1} + e_{2}\), \(e_{1} + e_{2} + e_{3}\) and \(e_{1} + e_{2} + e_{4}\) have \(b(r, r) = 2\) and \(b(r, L) = \mathbb{Z}\), and \(2\) divides \(2\). \(e_{1} - e_{2}\) has \(b(r, r) = -2\) and \(b(r, L) = \mathbb{Z}\), and \(-2\) divides \(2\). \(e_{5}\), \(e_{6}\), \(e_{7}\), \(e_{8}\), \(e_{9}\), \(e_{10}\), \(e_{11}\) and \(e_{12}\) have \(b(r, r) = -4\) and \(b(r, L) = 2\mathbb{Z}\), and \(-4\) divides \(4\). These roots are in \(L'\), and their invariant factors in \(L\) are \(1, \dots, 1, 2\), so they generate \(L'\): \(\mathbb{Z}\Phi(L) = L'\), of index 2 in \(L\).

Morphisms

References

  1. D. Allcock, "The period lattice for Enriques surfaces", arXiv:math/9905166, the introduction and Lemma 1.