Tag 02A1

\(U \oplus A_{2}(-4) \oplus \langle 12 \rangle\)

U + A2(-4) + <12>·invariant lattice of the symplectic K3 group G_34 of Hashimoto

Invariants

Rank5
Signature \((n_+, n_-)\)(2, 3)
Determinant\(-576\)

Gram tensor

The components \(b(e_i, e_j)\) of the Gram tensor \(b\) in the chosen basis \(e_{1}, \dots, e_{5}\).

In this basis, \(L = {}\)\(\mathbb{Z}\{e_{1}, e_{2}\}\) \(\oplus\) \(\mathbb{Z}\{e_{3}, e_{4}\}\) \(\oplus\) \(\mathbb{Z}\{e_{5}\}\), an orthogonal sum.

\(e_{1}\)\(e_{2}\)\(e_{3}\)\(e_{4}\)\(e_{5}\)
\(e_{1}\)0-1000
\(e_{2}\)-10000
\(e_{3}\)00-840
\(e_{4}\)004-80
\(e_{5}\)000012
[[0, -1, 0, 0, 0], [-1, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 0, -8, 4, 0], [0, 0, 4, -8, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 12]]

Integral lattice

Parityeven
Discriminant group\(\mathbb{Z}/4 \oplus (\mathbb{Z}/12)^{2}\)
Unimodularno
Integral overlattices \(L \subseteq M \subseteq L^*\)16
Primes of bad reduction \(\Sigma_L = \{p \mid 2 \det L\}\)\(\{2, 3\}\)
Zeta function of the cone \(X_0 : Q(x) = 0\), \(\Sigma = \Sigma_L\)\(\zeta^\Sigma(X_0, s) = \zeta^\Sigma(s - 4)\)
Zeta function of \(X_n : Q(x) = n\), \(n \neq 0\), \(\Sigma = \Sigma_L \cup \{p \mid n\}\)\(\zeta^\Sigma(X_n, s) = \zeta^\Sigma(s - 4)\, L^\Sigma(s - 2, \chi_{-576n})\)

Indefinite lattice

Isotropicyes

Roots

Root lattice: \(L = \mathbb{Z}\Phi(L)\)no
\(R(L) = \mathbb{Z}\Phi(L)\)isometry class not decided
Rank of \(R(L)\)5
\([L : R(L)]\)2
\(R(L)\) is primitive in \(L\)no: \(L / R(L) \cong \mathbb{Z}/2\)
ProofEach \(r_i\) in roots that generate \(\mathbb{Z}\Phi(L)\) is a root. The notes prove that each root of \(L\) is in \(\mathbb{Z}\{r_i\}\).

Roots that generate \(\mathbb{Z}\Phi(L)\)

RootCoordinates\(b(r, r)\)
\(r_{1}\)\(e_{1} + e_{2}\)\(-2\)
\(r_{2}\)\(e_{1} - e_{2}\)\(2\)
\(r_{3}\)\(e_{3}\)\(-8\)
\(r_{4}\)\(e_{4}\)\(-8\)
\(r_{5}\)\(e_{5}\)\(12\)

Notes

Let \(\Lambda = \mathrm{II}_{3,19}\) be the K3 lattice and \(G \subset O(\Lambda)\) a finite group of symplectic isometries. Row 34 of Table 10.3 of Hashimoto gives the invariant lattice \(\Lambda^G\) for the group \(\mathfrak{G}_{34} \cong \mathfrak{S}_4\) of Table 10.2, and this record is \(\Lambda^G(-1)\); \(\Lambda^G\) has signature \((3, 2)\) and the corpus records the sign with \(n_+ \leq n_-\).

The printed row 34 of Table 10.3 names \(U \oplus A_2(2) \oplus \langle -12 \rangle\), of determinant \(144\); its columns \(d = 576\) and \(q = 4_5^{+3}, 3^{+2}\) are those of \(U \oplus A_2(4) \oplus \langle -12 \rangle\), whose genus has one class, so the columns determine \(\Lambda^G\) and the record is that lattice.

Roots: write \(r = a e_{1} + c e_{2} + w\) with \(w\) in the span \(W\) of \(e_{3}, \dots, e_{5}\). \(b(e_{1}, e_{2}) = -1\) is odd, \(W\) is orthogonal to \(e_{1}\) and \(e_{2}\), and \(b(w, w) \in 4\mathbb{Z}\) for \(w\) in \(W\), because the Gram tensor of \(W\) has its diagonal components in \(4\mathbb{Z}\) and the others in \(2\mathbb{Z}\). So \(b(r, e_{2}) = -a\), \(b(r, e_{1}) = -c\) and \(b(r, r) = -2 a c + b(w, w)\). If \(a\) is odd and \(c\) is even, then \(b(r, r) \equiv 0 \bmod 4\), and \(b(r, r)\) divides \(2 b(r, e_{2}) = -2 a \equiv 2 \bmod 4\), which is impossible; the same holds with \(a\) and \(c\) exchanged. Each root is therefore in \(L' = \{a \equiv c \bmod 2\}\), which has index 2 in \(L\). \(e_{1} + e_{2}\) has \(b(r, r) = -2\) and \(b(r, L) = \mathbb{Z}\), and \(-2\) divides \(2\). \(e_{1} - e_{2}\) has \(b(r, r) = 2\) and \(b(r, L) = \mathbb{Z}\), and \(2\) divides \(2\). \(e_{3}\) and \(e_{4}\) have \(b(r, r) = -8\) and \(b(r, L) = 4\mathbb{Z}\), and \(-8\) divides \(8\). \(e_{5}\) has \(b(r, r) = 12\) and \(b(r, L) = 12\mathbb{Z}\), and \(12\) divides \(24\). These roots are in \(L'\), and their invariant factors in \(L\) are \(1, \dots, 1, 2\), so they generate \(L'\): \(\mathbb{Z}\Phi(L) = L'\), of index 2 in \(L\).

Morphisms

References

  1. K. Hashimoto, "Finite symplectic actions on the K3 lattice", arXiv:1012.2682, Tables 10.2 and 10.3.