Search the corpus

    Toric morphisms, completeness, and invariants read off the fan

    PR-TORMOR

    A toric variety is complete exactly when its fan fills the lattice space; toric properness is the same support condition after pullback.Suggest a slogan

    (Toric morphism)

    A lattice map \(\phi : N_1 \to N_2\) is compatible with fans \(\Sigma_1, \Sigma_2\) if every \(\sigma_1 \in \Sigma_1\) has some \(\sigma_2 \in \Sigma_2\) with \(\phi_\RR(\sigma_1) \subseteq \sigma_2\). Such a \(\phi\) induces \(X_{\Sigma_1} \to X_{\Sigma_2}\) carrying \(T_1\) into \(T_2\) by a group homomorphism, and every equivariant morphism arises this way. On affine pieces this is a semigroup map \(S_2 \to S_1\) inducing \(k[S_2] \to k[S_1]\).

    (Completeness)

    \(X_\Sigma\) is complete iff \(\abs{\Sigma} = N_\RR\). More generally \(\phi\) is proper iff \(\inverseof{\phi_\RR}(\abs{\Sigma_2}) = \abs{\Sigma_1}\).

    (Why, in one picture)

    Each \(u \in N\) gives a one-parameter subgroup \(\lambda^u : \GG_m \to T\), and the valuative criterion asks whether \(\lim_{t \to 0} \lambda^u(t)\) exists in \(X_\Sigma\). It does exactly when \(u\) lies in some cone of \(\Sigma\), and the limit is the distinguished point \(x_\sigma\) of the smallest cone containing \(u\). So full support means every one-parameter subgroup converges, which is completeness.

    For \(\PP^2\) with \(T = \ts{(1 : s : t)}\) and \(\lambda^u(t) = (1 : t^{u_1} : t^{u_2})\), the three maximal cones of the fan are precisely the three regions of \(u\) sending the limit to each of the three coordinate points.

    (Two cheap invariants)

    \[ \pi_1(X_\Sigma) \cong N / N', \qquad N' = \gens{ \sigma \intersect N \st \sigma \in \Sigma } , \] so a fan whose rays generate \(N\) gives a simply connected variety. For \(X_\Sigma\) smooth and complete, the topological Euler characteristic is the number of maximal cones, \[ \chi(X_\Sigma) = \size \Sigma(n) , \] because the torus orbits give a cell decomposition and only the fixed points contribute.

    What is a toric morphism, on lattices and on varieties?
    When is a toric variety complete, and why?

    Dependencies

    • PR-O8V3IThe orbit-cone correspondenceuses

    Backlinks

    • T-FULBETTIBetti numbers of a smooth complete toric variety from the cone countsuses
    • FE-TORBLOWBlowup as star subdivision, and P^2 blown up at a fixed pointuses
    • PR-FULCRITSmooth, complete, projective, Fano, read off the fanuses
    • FE-FULHIRZBUNThe Hirzebruch surface as a projective bundle over the lineuses

    What links to this