FC12 — Beauville, Complex Algebraic Surfaces, 2nd ed.
FC12 — Beauville, Complex Algebraic Surfaces.
This chapter contains 1 definition, 2 propositions, 1 lemma and 6 examples.
Of the 10 statements checked against Lean, 0 are formalized somewhere and 10 are not.
| Status | Statements | Share | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| not formalized | 10 | 100% | A documented search found no Lean statement of it anywhere. |
| checked in total | 10 |
- Canonical block
FC12-C09-U001–FC12-C09-U010, exactly 10 contiguous units. - Search order: project
A=12618f8abc2b4852b3da9ab65c3bc547ac4c1f19, P=db584cd6d46c92f209a44c0f1c829460d327499d, H=71a80585ee495fc24472fd0eaffc89d94e4fd8d6, current/open/indexed, Reservoir/packages, broad GitHub Lean and local references. - Result: 0 positive routes, 10 dated unmatched rows.
- Targeted P/H search found no elliptic-surface/fibration object, canonical bundle formula for an elliptic surface, Kodaira-dimension-one pluricanonical theorem, or compatible external Lean implementation. Existing elliptic-curve and scheme infrastructure realizes only proper subsets.
Lemma IX.1
Lemma IX.1 Let \(s\) be a non-ruled minimal surface. (a)f \(K ^ { 2 } > 0\) , there exists an integer \(\pmb { n _ { 0 } }\) such that \(\phi _ { n K }\) maps \(s\) birationally onto its image for al \(n \geqslant n _ { 0 }\) (b)If \(K ^ { 2 } = 0\) and \(P _ { r } \geqslant 2\) ,write \(r K \equiv Z + M\) ,where \(z\) is the fired part of the system \(\vert r K \vert\) and \(M\) is the mobile part. Then \[ K . Z = K . M = Z ^ { 2 } = Z . M = M ^ { 2 } = 0 \ . \]
Not formalized. none; no complete checked declaration under strict bundle semantics — No complete checked Lean owner was found for this elliptic-surface/Kodaira-dimension-one statement. P/H has elliptic curves, rational maps, products, finite-group and scheme machinery, but no elliptic fibration of surfaces, canonical bundle/pluricanonical linear-system formulas, or the K3/Enriques/bielliptic/Abelian-surface interfaces used by the examples; strict whole-row semantics reject these proper subsets.
Proposition IX.2
Proposition IX.2 Let \(s\) be a minimal surface with \(\kappa = 1\) (a) We have \(K ^ { 2 } = 0\) : (b) There is a smooth curve \(B\) and a surjective morphism \(p : S B\) whose generic fibre is an elliptic curve.
Not formalized. none; no complete checked declaration under strict bundle semantics — No complete checked Lean owner was found for this elliptic-surface/Kodaira-dimension-one statement. P/H has elliptic curves, rational maps, products, finite-group and scheme machinery, but no elliptic fibration of surfaces, canonical bundle/pluricanonical linear-system formulas, or the K3/Enriques/bielliptic/Abelian-surface interfaces used by the examples; strict whole-row semantics reject these proper subsets.
Definition: An elliptic surface is a surface admitting a fibration over a curve whose…
An elliptic surface is a surface admitting a fibration over a curve whose generic fibre is a smooth curve of genus \(1\).
Not formalized. none; no complete checked declaration under strict bundle semantics — No complete checked Lean owner was found for this elliptic-surface/Kodaira-dimension-one statement. P/H has elliptic curves, rational maps, products, finite-group and scheme machinery, but no elliptic fibration of surfaces, canonical bundle/pluricanonical linear-system formulas, or the K3/Enriques/bielliptic/Abelian-surface interfaces used by the examples; strict whole-row semantics reject these proper subsets.
Proposition IX.3
Proposition IX.3 Let \(s\) be a minimal elliptic surface, \(p : S B\) theelliptic fibration; for \(\boldsymbol { b } \in B\) ,put \(F _ { b } = p ^ { * } [ b ]\) : (a) We have \(K _ { S } ^ { 2 } = 0\) : (b) \(s\) is either ruled over an elliptic curve, or a surface with \(\kappa = 0\) , or a surface with \(\kappa = 1\) (c)If \(\kappa ( S ) = 1\) , there exists an integer \(d > 0\) such that \[ d K \equiv \sum _ { i } n _ { i } F _ { b _ { i } } \ , n _ { i } \in \mathbb { N } , \ b _ { i } \in B \ . \] For r sufficiently large, the system \(\{ r d K \vert\) is without base points and defines a morphism from \(s\) to \(\mathbb { P } ^ { N }\) which factorizes as \(\boldsymbol { \mathscr { f } } : \mathcal { S } \overset { \mathcal { P } } { \longrightarrow } \boldsymbol { B } \overset { \mathcal { j } } { \longrightarrow } \mathbb { P } ^ { N }\) where \(j\) is an embedding of \(B\) in \(\mathbb { P } ^ { N }\)
Not formalized. none; no complete checked declaration under strict bundle semantics — No complete checked Lean owner was found for this elliptic-surface/Kodaira-dimension-one statement. P/H has elliptic curves, rational maps, products, finite-group and scheme machinery, but no elliptic fibration of surfaces, canonical bundle/pluricanonical linear-system formulas, or the K3/Enriques/bielliptic/Abelian-surface interfaces used by the examples; strict whole-row semantics reject these proper subsets.
Example IX.4(1)
Products \(E\times\mathbf P^1\), and more generally suitable quotients \((E\times\mathbf P^1)/G\), are ruled elliptic surfaces.
Not formalized. none; no complete checked declaration under strict bundle semantics — No complete checked Lean owner was found for this elliptic-surface/Kodaira-dimension-one statement. P/H has elliptic curves, rational maps, products, finite-group and scheme machinery, but no elliptic fibration of surfaces, canonical bundle/pluricanonical linear-system formulas, or the K3/Enriques/bielliptic/Abelian-surface interfaces used by the examples; strict whole-row semantics reject these proper subsets.
Example IX.4(2)
A bielliptic surface is elliptic and carries the two natural fibrations induced by its two elliptic factors.
Not formalized. none; no complete checked declaration under strict bundle semantics — No complete checked Lean owner was found for this elliptic-surface/Kodaira-dimension-one statement. P/H has elliptic curves, rational maps, products, finite-group and scheme machinery, but no elliptic fibration of surfaces, canonical bundle/pluricanonical linear-system formulas, or the K3/Enriques/bielliptic/Abelian-surface interfaces used by the examples; strict whole-row semantics reject these proper subsets.
Example IX.4(3)
An Abelian surface is elliptic exactly when it fits into an exact sequence \(0\to E\to A\to F\to0\) of elliptic curves.
Not formalized. none; no complete checked declaration under strict bundle semantics — No complete checked Lean owner was found for this elliptic-surface/Kodaira-dimension-one statement. P/H has elliptic curves, rational maps, products, finite-group and scheme machinery, but no elliptic fibration of surfaces, canonical bundle/pluricanonical linear-system formulas, or the K3/Enriques/bielliptic/Abelian-surface interfaces used by the examples; strict whole-row semantics reject these proper subsets.
Example IX.4(4)
K3 surfaces occur in elliptic families, including Weierstrass models with prescribed singular fibres.
Not formalized. none; no complete checked declaration under strict bundle semantics — No complete checked Lean owner was found for this elliptic-surface/Kodaira-dimension-one statement. P/H has elliptic curves, rational maps, products, finite-group and scheme machinery, but no elliptic fibration of surfaces, canonical bundle/pluricanonical linear-system formulas, or the K3/Enriques/bielliptic/Abelian-surface interfaces used by the examples; strict whole-row semantics reject these proper subsets.
Example IX.4(5)
An Enriques surface can carry an elliptic pencil; the exhibited construction descends an invariant genus-one pencil from its K3 cover.
Not formalized. none; no complete checked declaration under strict bundle semantics — No complete checked Lean owner was found for this elliptic-surface/Kodaira-dimension-one statement. P/H has elliptic curves, rational maps, products, finite-group and scheme machinery, but no elliptic fibration of surfaces, canonical bundle/pluricanonical linear-system formulas, or the K3/Enriques/bielliptic/Abelian-surface interfaces used by the examples; strict whole-row semantics reject these proper subsets.
Example IX.5
Example IX.5 Let \(B\) be a smooth curve, \(\pmb { p } , \pmb { q }\) the two projections of \(B \times \mathbb { P } ^ { 2 }\) onto \(B\) and \(\mathbb { P } ^ { 2 }\) \(| D |\) a base-point free linear system on \(B\) A general divisor \(S \in | p ^ { * } \mathcal { O } _ { B } ( D ) \otimes q ^ { * } \mathcal { O } _ { \mathbb { P } } ( 3 ) |\) is smooth; the restriction \(p : S B\) is a fibration by plane cubics,hence elliptic curves. We have \(K _ { S } \equiv p ^ { * } ( K _ { B } + D )\) ,and when \(\deg ( D ) > 2 - 2 g ( B )\) we have \(\kappa ( S ) = 1\) :
Not formalized. none; no complete checked declaration under strict bundle semantics — No complete checked Lean owner was found for this elliptic-surface/Kodaira-dimension-one statement. P/H has elliptic curves, rational maps, products, finite-group and scheme machinery, but no elliptic fibration of surfaces, canonical bundle/pluricanonical linear-system formulas, or the K3/Enriques/bielliptic/Abelian-surface interfaces used by the examples; strict whole-row semantics reject these proper subsets.