Search the corpus

    Preliminaries

    Zorn’s lemma: a nonempty partially ordered set in which every chain has an upper bound has a maximal element. It gives a maximal ideal containing any proper ideal of a ring with \(1\), an algebraic closure of every field, and a basis of every vector space. Euler’s totient \(\varphi(n)\) is the number of generators of a cyclic group of order \(n\) and the degree \([\QQ(\zeta_n):\QQ]\) of the \(n\)th cyclotomic field. The Chinese remainder theorem gives \(R/(I\cap J)\cong R/I\times R/J\) for comaximal ideals \(I,J\) of a commutative ring \(R\), in particular \(\ZZ/mn\ZZ\cong\ZZ/m\ZZ\times\ZZ/n\ZZ\) for coprime \(m,n\). Euler’s theorem \(a^{\varphi(n)}\equiv1\pmod{n}\) for \(\gcd(a,n)=1\) is Lagrange’s theorem in \((\ZZ/n\ZZ)^\times\), and Fermat’s little theorem is its case \(n=p\) prime.

    Chain in a poset

    Let \((X,\leq)\) be a partially ordered set. A chain in \(X\) is a subset \(C\subseteq X\) that is totally ordered by \(\leq\): for all \(c,c'\in C\), \(c\leq c'\) or \(c'\leq c\).

    Let \((X,\leq)\) be a partially ordered set and \(S\subseteq X\). An upper bound of \(S\) is an element \(x\in X\) such that \(s\leq x\) for all \(s\in S\).

    Zorn's lemma

    If every chain has an upper bound, a maximal element exists.Suggest a slogan

    Let \((P,\le)\) be a partially ordered set in which every chain has an upper bound in \(P\). Then \(P\) has a maximal element: an element \(m\in P\) such that \(m\le x\) with \(x\in P\) implies \(x=m\).

    The empty chain is a chain, so the hypothesis forces \(P\) to be nonempty.

    State Zorn's lemma.

    Zorn's lemma

    Upper bounds for every chain force a maximal element.Suggest a slogan

    If \(P\) is a poset in which every chain has an upper bound in \(P\), then \(P\) has a maximal element.

    Krull's theorem on maximal ideals

    Every proper ideal extends to a maximal ideal.Suggest a slogan

    Let \(R\) be a commutative ring. Every proper ideal \(I\subsetneq R\) is contained in a maximal ideal of \(R\). In particular, applying this to \(I=0\), every nonzero commutative ring has a maximal ideal.

    Let \(P\) be the set of proper ideals of \(R\) containing \(I\), ordered by inclusion; it contains \(I\). The union of a nonempty chain in \(P\) is an ideal containing \(I\), and it is proper because it does not contain \(1\), so it is an upper bound in \(P\); the empty chain has the upper bound \(I\). By Zorn's lemma, \(P\) has a maximal element, which is a maximal ideal of \(R\) containing \(I\).

    What is Krull's theorem?

    Krull's theorem on maximal ideals

    Every proper ideal of a nonzero ring sits inside a maximal ideal.Suggest a slogan

    Let \(R\) be a nonzero ring. Then every proper ideal of \(R\) is contained in a proper maximal ideal; in particular, \(R\) has a proper maximal ideal.

    Existence of maximal ideals

    Every proper ideal is contained in a maximal ideal.Suggest a slogan

    Let \(R\) be a ring and \(I\subsetneq R\) a proper ideal. Then \(I\) is contained in a maximal ideal of \(R\).

    Let \(\mathcal S\) be the set of proper ideals of \(R\) containing \(I\), ordered by inclusion; it is nonempty since \(I\in\mathcal S\). If \(\mathcal C\subseteq\mathcal S\) is a nonempty chain, then \(J\coloneqq\bigcup_{J'\in\mathcal C}J'\) is an ideal containing \(I\), and \(1\notin J\) because \(1\) lies in no proper ideal, so \(J\in\mathcal S\) is an upper bound for \(\mathcal C\). By Zorn’s lemma \(\mathcal S\) has a maximal element \(\mathfrak m\). Any ideal strictly containing \(\mathfrak m\) contains \(I\) and is not in \(\mathcal S\), so it equals \(R\); thus \(\mathfrak m\) is a maximal ideal.

    Euler's totient function

    Euler’s totient function \(\phi\colon\ZZ_{\geq 1}\to\ZZ_{\geq 1}\) is \[ \phi(n) \coloneqq \size \theset{ k\in\ZZ \st 1\leq k\leq n,\ \gcd(k ,n ) = 1}. \]

    Euler's totient of a prime power

    A prime power keeps the proportion $1-1/p$ of its residues coprime.Suggest a slogan

    For a prime \(p\) and an integer \(k\ge1\), the Euler totient of \(p^k\) is \[ \phi(p^k)=p^{k-1}(p-1)=p^k\qty{1-\frac1p}. \]

    An integer \(m\) with \(1\le m\le p^k\) fails to be coprime to \(p^k\) exactly when \(p\divides m\), and there are \(p^{k-1}\) such multiples of \(p\). So \(\phi(p^k)=p^k-p^{k-1}\).

    What is $\phi(p^k)$?

    Fermat's little theorem

    Modulo a prime $p$, every integer satisfies $a^p\equiv a$.Suggest a slogan

    Let \(p\) be a prime and let \(a\in\ZZ\). Then \[ a^p\equiv a\pmod p, \] and if \(p\nmid a\), then \(a^{p-1}\equiv1\pmod p\).

    If \(p\nmid a\), the class of \(a\) lies in the group \(\FF_p^\times\) of order \(p-1\), so \(a^{p-1}\equiv1\pmod p\) by Lagrange’s theorem, and multiplying by \(a\) gives \(a^p\equiv a\pmod p\). If \(p\divides a\), both sides of \(a^p\equiv a\) are \(0\) modulo \(p\).

    State Fermat's little theorem.

    Euler's theorem

    A unit modulo $n$ raised to $\phi(n)$ is $1$ modulo $n$.Suggest a slogan

    Let \(n\ge1\) and let \(a\in\ZZ\) with \(\gcd(a,n)=1\). Then \[ a^{\phi(n)}\equiv1\pmod n, \] where \(\phi\) is the Euler totient function.

    The class of \(a\) lies in the group \((\ZZ/n\ZZ)^\times\) of order \(\phi(n)\), so its order divides \(\phi(n)\) by Lagrange’s theorem.

    If \(n>1\) and \(d=\gcd(a,n)>1\), then \(a^k\not\equiv1\pmod n\) for every \(k\ge1\), since \(d\) divides both \(a^k\) and \(n\) but not \(1\). For \(a=2\) and \(n=4\), \(2^{\phi(4)}=2^2=4\equiv0\pmod4\).

    State Euler's theorem, and say why coprimality is needed.

    Chinese remainder theorem

    Coprime moduli split one congruence class modulo $pq$ into independent classes modulo $p$ and $q$.Suggest a slogan

    Let \(p\) and \(q\) be positive integers with \(\gcd(p, q) = 1\). Then \[ \ZZ/pq\ZZ \cong \ZZ/p\ZZ \times \ZZ/q\ZZ. \]

    Injective maps are the maps with a left inverse

    A map from a nonempty set is one-to-one exactly when it splits on the left.Suggest a slogan

    Let \(X\) be a nonempty set and \(f\colon X\to Y\) a map of sets. Then \(f\) is injective, that is, \(f(x) = f(x')\) implies \(x=x'\) for all \(x,x'\in X\), if and only if \(f\) has a left inverse: a map \(g\colon Y\to X\) with \(g(f(x))=x\) for every \(x\in X\).

    If \(g\) is a left inverse and \(f(x)=f(x')\), then \(x=g(f(x))=g(f(x'))=x'\). Conversely, suppose \(f\) is injective and fix \(x_0\in X\). Define \(g(y)\) to be the unique \(x\in X\) with \(f(x)=y\) when \(y\in f(X)\), and \(g(y)\coloneqq x_0\) otherwise; then \(g(f(x))=x\) for every \(x\in X\).

    The hypothesis \(X\neq\emptyset\) is needed: for a nonempty set \(Y\), the empty map \(\emptyset\to Y\) is injective but has no left inverse, since there is no map \(Y\to\emptyset\).

    What condition on inverses characterises an injective function?

    Surjective maps are the maps with a right inverse

    A set map is onto exactly when it splits on the right.Suggest a slogan

    Let \(f\colon X\to Y\) be a map of sets. Then \(f\) is surjective, that is, for every \(y\in Y\) there exists \(x\in X\) with \(f(x)=y\), if and only if \(f\) has a right inverse: a map \(g\colon Y\to X\) with \(f(g(y))=y\) for every \(y\in Y\).

    If \(g\) is a right inverse, then each \(y\in Y\) equals \(f(g(y))\), so \(f\) is surjective. Conversely, if \(f\) is surjective, then each fiber \(f^{-1}(y)\) is nonempty, and the axiom of choice gives a map \(g\colon Y\to X\) with \(g(y)\in f^{-1}(y)\) for every \(y\); then \(f(g(y))=y\).

    What condition on inverses characterises a surjective function?