Search the corpus

    Fields and extensions

    For fields \(K\subseteq L\subseteq M\), \([M:K]=[M:L][L:K]\). An element \(\alpha\in L\) is algebraic over \(K\) if and only if \([K(\alpha):K]\) is finite, and then \([K(\alpha):K]\) is the degree of the minimal polynomial of \(\alpha\). An algebraic extension \(L/K\) is normal if every irreducible polynomial in \(K[x]\) with a root in \(L\) splits into linear factors in \(L[x]\); a finite extension is normal if and only if it is the splitting field of a polynomial in \(K[x]\). It is separable if the minimal polynomial of every element of \(L\) has distinct roots. A polynomial \(f\) has a repeated root in its splitting field if and only if \(\gcd(f,f')\ne1\), and every algebraic extension of a perfect field, such as a field of characteristic \(0\) or a finite field, is separable. For each prime power \(q\) there is a field \(\FF_q\) with \(q\) elements, unique up to isomorphism, and every finite extension of a finite field is normal and separable.

    Subfield $K(\alpha)$ generated by an element of an extension field

    Let \(F\) be a field, \(K\subseteq F\) a subfield, and \(\alpha\in F\). The subfield generated by \(K\) and \(\alpha\), written \(K(\alpha)\), is the smallest subfield of \(F\) containing \(K\) and \(\alpha\), that is, the intersection of all subfields of \(F\) that contain \(K\cup\theset{\alpha}\).

    For $\alpha$ in an extension $F \supset K$, what is $K(\alpha)$?

    Subring $K[\alpha]$ generated by an element of an extension field

    Let \(F\) be a field, \(K\subseteq F\) a subfield, and \(\alpha\in F\). The subring generated by \(K\) and \(\alpha\), written \(K[\alpha]\), is the smallest subring of \(F\) containing \(K\) and \(\alpha\), that is, the intersection of all subrings of \(F\) that contain \(K\cup\theset{\alpha}\).

    \(K[\alpha]=\theset{g(\alpha) \st g\in K[x]}\), the image of the evaluation homomorphism \(K[x]\to F\), \(g\mapsto g(\alpha)\): this image is a subring containing \(K\) and \(\alpha\), and every such subring contains each \(g(\alpha)\).

    For $\alpha$ in an extension $F \supset K$, what is $K[\alpha]$?

    Subfield $K(\alpha)$ generated by an element of an extension field

    Let \(F\) be a field, \(K\subseteq F\) a subfield, and \(\alpha\in F\). The subfield generated by \(K\) and \(\alpha\), written \(K(\alpha)\), is the smallest subfield of \(F\) containing \(K\) and \(\alpha\), that is, the intersection of all subfields of \(F\) that contain \(K\cup\theset{\alpha}\).

    Which subfield of $F$ is $K(\alpha)$?

    Algebraic field extension

    A field extension \(L/k\) is algebraic if every \(\alpha \in L\) is algebraic over \(k\), that is, a root of some nonzero polynomial \(f\in k[x]\).

    When is a field extension $L/k$ algebraic?
    When is a field extension $L/K$ algebraic?
    When is a field extension $L/K$ algebraic over $K$?

    Algebraic element of a field extension

    Let \(L/K\) be a field extension. An element \(\alpha \in L\) is algebraic over \(K\) if there exists a nonzero polynomial \(g\in K[x]\) with \(g(\alpha) = 0\).

    For a field extension $L/K$, when is $\alpha \in L$ algebraic over $K$?

    Finite extensions are algebraic

    Finite vector-space dimension forces every field element to satisfy a polynomial.Suggest a slogan

    Let \(L/K\) be a field extension with \([L:K]<\infty\). Then every \(\alpha\in L\) is algebraic over \(K\).

    Let \(n=[L:K]\). The \(n+1\) elements \(1,\alpha,\ldots,\alpha^n\) of the \(n\)-dimensional \(K\)-vector space \(L\) are linearly dependent, so there are \(c_0,\ldots,c_n\in K\), not all zero, with \(\sum_{i=0}^n c_i\alpha^i=0\). Thus \(\alpha\) is a root of the nonzero polynomial \(\sum_{i=0}^n c_ix^i\in K[x]\).

    An algebraic extension of an algebraic extension is algebraic

    Algebraicity is transitive in towers of field extensions.Suggest a slogan

    Let \(k \subseteq K \subseteq L\) be fields, with the extensions not necessarily finite. If \(L/K\) and \(K/k\) are algebraic, then \(L/k\) is algebraic.

    Tower law for field degrees

    Finite field degrees multiply in towers.Suggest a slogan

    Let \(k\subseteq F\subseteq L\) be field extensions with \([L:F]\) and \([F:k]\) finite. Then \([L:k]\) is finite and \[ [L : k] = [L: F]\,[F: k]. \]

    Let \(\alpha_1,\ldots,\alpha_m\) be a basis of \(F\) over \(k\) and \(\beta_1,\ldots,\beta_n\) a basis of \(L\) over \(F\). Every \(x\in L\) is \(\sum_j c_j\beta_j\) with \(c_j\in F\), and each \(c_j=\sum_i a_{ij}\alpha_i\) with \(a_{ij}\in k\), so the \(\alpha_i\beta_j\) span \(L\) over \(k\). If \(\sum_{i,j}a_{ij}\alpha_i\beta_j=0\) with \(a_{ij}\in k\), then linear independence of the \(\beta_j\) over \(F\) gives \(\sum_ia_{ij}\alpha_i=0\) for each \(j\), and linear independence of the \(\alpha_i\) over \(k\) gives \(a_{ij}=0\). So the \(mn\) products \(\alpha_i\beta_j\) form a basis of \(L\) over \(k\).

    Simple extensions

    A field extension \(L/k\) is simple if there exists \(\alpha\in L\) such that \(L = k(\alpha)\).

    Embeddings and lifts of field homomorphisms

    Let \(k\) be a field and let \(L/k\) and \(L'/k\) be field extensions. A \(k\)-embedding \(L\embeds L'\) is a ring homomorphism \(\tau\colon L\to L'\) that restricts to the identity on \(k\):

    Here \(\iota\) and \(\iota'\) are the inclusions, and the triangle commutes: \(\tau\circ\iota=\iota'\).

    More generally, let \(\sigma\colon k\to k'\) be a homomorphism of fields and let \(L/k\) and \(L'/k'\) be field extensions with inclusions \(\iota\colon k\to L\) and \(\iota'\colon k'\to L'\). A lift of \(\sigma\) to \(L\to L'\) is a ring homomorphism \(\tau\colon L\to L'\) such that \(\tau\circ\iota=\iota'\circ\sigma\):

    A lift of \(\sigma=\id_k\) is a \(k\)-embedding.

    Every ring homomorphism \(\tau\colon L\to L'\) between fields is injective: \(\ker\tau\) is an ideal of \(L\) not containing \(1\), and the only such ideal of a field is \(0\).

    Distinguished classes of field extensions

    A class \(\mathcal{S}\) of field extensions is distinguished if it satisfies the following two conditions.

    1. For every tower of fields \(k\subseteq K\subseteq L\), \(L/k \in \mathcal{S}\) if and only if \(L/K \in \mathcal{S}\) and \(K/k\in \mathcal{S}\):
    1. If \(K/k\in \mathcal{S}\) and \(L/k\) is an extension such that \(K\) and \(L\) are subfields of a common field, then \(LK/L \in \mathcal{S}\), where \(LK\) is the compositum. The extension \(LK/L\) is the lift of \(K/k\) to \(L\):

    Let \(\mathcal{S}\) be a distinguished class of field extensions. If \(L/k\in\mathcal{S}\) and \(K/k\in \mathcal{S}\), with \(K\) and \(L\) subfields of a common field, then \(LK/k \in \mathcal{S}\):

    By the lifting condition applied to \(K/k\in\mathcal{S}\) and \(L/k\), the extension \(LK/L\) lies in \(\mathcal{S}\). Applying the tower condition to \(k\subseteq L\subseteq LK\), with \(LK/L\in\mathcal{S}\) and \(L/k\in\mathcal{S}\), gives \(LK/k\in\mathcal{S}\).

    Splitting field of a polynomial

    Let \(k\) be a field and \(f\in k[x]\) a nonzero polynomial. A splitting field of \(f\) over \(k\) is a field extension \(F/k\) such that \(f\) splits into linear factors in \(F[x]\) and \(f\) does not split into linear factors in \(E[x]\) for any proper subfield \(E\subsetneq F\) containing \(k\).

    Equivalently, \(f\) splits in \(F[x]\) as \(f=c\prod_{i=1}^n(x-\alpha_i)\) and \(F=k(\alpha_1,\ldots,\alpha_n)\): a subfield of \(F\) containing \(k\) over which \(f\) splits contains every root \(\alpha_i\), and \(k(\alpha_1,\ldots,\alpha_n)\) is such a subfield.

    What is the splitting field of a polynomial $f \in k[x]$?

    Normal field extension

    Let \(L/k\) be an algebraic field extension. The extension \(L/k\) is normal if every irreducible polynomial \(f\in k[x]\) that has a root in \(L\) splits into linear factors in \(L[x]\).

    Equivalently, for every \(\alpha\in L\), all roots of the minimal polynomial of \(\alpha\) over \(k\) in an algebraic closure of \(L\), the conjugates of \(\alpha\) over \(k\), lie in \(L\). Thus an irreducible \(f\in k[x]\) either splits in \(L[x]\) or has no root in \(L\).

    Normal field extension

    An algebraic field extension \(L/K\) is normal if every irreducible polynomial \(p \in K[x]\) either has no roots in \(L\) or splits into linear factors in \(L[x]\).

    What does it mean for a field extension $L/K$ to be normal?
    What does an irreducible $p(x) \in K[x]$ do in a normal extension $L/K$?

    Characterization of finite normal extensions as splitting fields

    Finite normal extensions are exactly splitting fields of nonzero polynomials.Suggest a slogan

    Let \(k\) be a field and \(L/k\) a field extension. Then \(L/k\) is finite and normal if and only if \(L\) is the splitting field over \(k\) of some nonzero polynomial \(f\in k[x]\).

    Fix an algebraic closure \(\bar k\) containing \(L\).

    Suppose \(L/k\) is finite and normal, and write \(L=k(\beta_1,\ldots,\beta_r)\). Let \(f\) be the product of the minimal polynomials of the \(\beta_i\) over \(k\). By normality each factor splits in \(L\), and \(L\) is generated over \(k\) by roots of \(f\), so \(L\) is the splitting field of \(f\).

    Conversely, let \(L=k(\alpha_1,\ldots,\alpha_n)\), where \(\alpha_1,\ldots,\alpha_n\) are the roots of \(f\) in \(L\) and \(f\) splits in \(L\). Then \(L/k\) is finite. A \(k\)-embedding \(\sigma\colon L\to\bar k\) sends each \(\alpha_i\) to a root of \(f\), and \(f\) splits in \(L\), so \(\sigma\) permutes \(\theset{\alpha_1,\ldots,\alpha_n}\) and \(\sigma(L)=L\). By PR-OZYUC, \(L/k\) is normal.

    Normal closure of a field extension

    Let \(K/k\) be an algebraic field extension. A normal closure of \(K/k\) is a field extension \(N/K\) such that \(N/k\) is normal and no proper subfield of \(N\) containing \(K\) is normal over \(k\).

    A normal closure exists: inside an algebraic closure \(\bar K\) of \(K\), take the subfield generated over \(k\) by all roots in \(\bar K\) of the minimal polynomials over \(k\) of the elements of \(K\). It is unique up to an isomorphism that restricts to the identity on \(K\).

    Compositum and intersection of normal extensions

    Normal extensions are closed under compositum and intersection.Suggest a slogan

    Let \(k\) be a field, let \(\Omega\) be an algebraic closure of \(k\), and let \(E_1, E_2 \subseteq \Omega\) be extensions of \(k\). If \(E_1/k\) and \(E_2/k\) are normal, then the compositum \(E_1E_2/k\) and the intersection \((E_1 \cap E_2)/k\) are normal.

    If $L/k$ is normal, then $L/K$ is normal for every intermediate field $K$

    Normality descends from the base field to every intermediate field.Suggest a slogan

    Let \(L/k\) be a finite normal extension and let \(K\) be a field with \(k \subseteq K \subseteq L\). Then \(L/K\) is normal.

    Characterization of normal algebraic extensions

    An algebraic extension is normal exactly when every base-field embedding preserves the extension.Suggest a slogan

    Let \(k\) be a field, let \(L/k\) be an algebraic extension, and let \(\bar{k}\) be an algebraic closure of \(k\) containing \(L\). Then \(L/k\) is normal if and only if every \(k\)-embedding \(\sigma\colon L\to \bar{k}\) satisfies \(\sigma(L) = L\). In that case every \(k\)-embedding \(\sigma\colon L\to\bar k\) restricts to a \(k\)-automorphism of \(L\):

    Suppose \(L/k\) is normal and let \(\sigma\colon L\to\bar k\) be a \(k\)-embedding. For \(\alpha\in L\) with minimal polynomial \(m_\alpha\in k[x]\), \(\sigma(\alpha)\) is a root of \(m_\alpha\), and all roots of \(m_\alpha\) lie in \(L\), so \(\sigma(L)\subseteq L\). Moreover \(\sigma\) injects the finite set of roots of \(m_\alpha\) in \(L\) into itself, hence permutes it, so \(\alpha\) lies in \(\sigma(L)\); thus \(\sigma(L)=L\).

    Conversely, suppose every \(k\)-embedding \(L\to\bar k\) has image \(L\). Let \(f\in k[x]\) be irreducible with a root \(\alpha\in L\), and let \(\beta\in\bar k\) be any root of \(f\). There is a \(k\)-embedding \(k(\alpha)\to\bar k\) with \(\alpha\mapsto\beta\), and since \(L/k(\alpha)\) is algebraic and \(\bar k\) is algebraically closed, it extends to a \(k\)-embedding \(\sigma\colon L\to\bar k\). Then \(\beta=\sigma(\alpha)\in\sigma(L)=L\), so \(f\) splits in \(L\) and \(L/k\) is normal.

    Separable polynomial

    Let \(k\) be a field with algebraic closure \(\bar{k}\). A nonzero polynomial \(f \in k[x]\) is separable if \(f\) has no repeated roots in \(\bar{k}\).

    Separable field extension

    Let \(L/k\) be a field extension. An element \(\alpha\in L\) that is algebraic over \(k\) is separable over \(k\) if its minimal polynomial over \(k\) is separable. An algebraic extension \(L/k\) is separable if every \(\alpha\in L\) is separable over \(k\).

    An algebraic extension \(L/k\) is separable if and only if every finite subextension \(k\subseteq L'\subseteq L\) is separable over \(k\).

    If \(L/k\) is separable, every element of a subextension \(L'\) is an element of \(L\), hence separable over \(k\). Conversely, each \(\alpha\in L\) lies in the finite subextension \(k(\alpha)\), which is separable by hypothesis, so \(\alpha\) is separable over \(k\).

    Separable field extension

    Let \(L/K\) be an algebraic field extension. \(L/K\) is separable if for every \(\alpha \in L\) the minimal polynomial \(m_\alpha\in K[x]\) of \(\alpha\) over \(K\) is separable.

    Let \(K\) be a field and \(f\in K[x]\) irreducible. Then \(f\) is separable if and only if its formal derivative \(f'\) is nonzero.

    Let \(\bar K\) be an algebraic closure of \(K\). A root \(\beta\in\bar K\) of \(f\) is repeated if and only if \(f'(\beta)=0\), since writing \(f=(x-\beta)g\) gives \(f'(\beta)=g(\beta)\). If \(f'=0\), every root of \(f\) is repeated, so \(f\) is not separable. If \(f'\neq0\) and \(\beta\) is a repeated root, then \(f\), being irreducible, is a scalar multiple of the minimal polynomial of \(\beta\) over \(K\), so \(f\) divides \(f'\); this is impossible because \(\deg f'<\deg f\) and \(f'\neq0\).

    What does it mean for a field extension $L/K$ to be separable?
    What does it mean for a field extension $L/K$ to be separable, in terms of minimal polynomials?

    Separable degree

    Let \(L/k\) be an algebraic field extension, let \(\bar{k}\) be an algebraic closure of \(k\), and fix an embedding \(\sigma\colon k\embeds \bar{k}\). The separable degree \([L:k]_s\) is the cardinality of the set of field embeddings \(\sigma'\colon L\to \bar{k}\) that extend \(\sigma\), that is, with \(\sigma'|_k=\sigma\):

    Here \(\iota\colon k\embeds L\) is the inclusion.

    Characterizations of separability for finite extensions

    A finite extension is separable exactly when separable generators exist and the separable degree equals the degree.Suggest a slogan

    Let \(L/k\) be a finite field extension, and let \([L:k]_s\) be its separable degree, the number of \(k\)-embeddings \(L \to \bar{k}\) into an algebraic closure \(\bar{k}\) of \(k\). The following are equivalent:

    • \(L/k\) is separable.

    • \(L = k(\alpha)\) for some \(\alpha \in L\) separable over \(k\).

    • \(L = k(S)\) for some set \(S \subseteq L\) of elements separable over \(k\).

    • \([L:k]_s = [L:k]\).

    A polynomial is separable if and only if $\gcd(f, f') = 1$

    A polynomial is separable exactly when it is coprime to its derivative; their gcd records repeated roots.Suggest a slogan

    Let \(k\) be a field and \(f \in k[x]\) a nonzero polynomial. Then \(f\) is separable if and only if \(\gcd(f, f') = 1\) in \(k[x]\), that is, if and only if \(f\) and \(f'\) have no common root in an algebraic closure \(\bar{k}\). Moreover, the repeated roots of \(f\) in \(\bar{k}\) are exactly the roots of \(\gcd(f, f')\).

    The derivative detects separability for irreducible polynomials

    Separability is equivalent to coprimality with the derivative; for irreducibles, to a nonzero derivative.Suggest a slogan

    Let \(k\) be a field and let \(f\in k[x]\) be nonzero.

    1. \(f\) is separable if and only if \(\gcd(f, f') = 1\).

    2. If \(f\) is irreducible, then \(f\) is separable if and only if \(f'\neq 0\).

    3. If \(\ch k = 0\), every irreducible \(f\) is separable.

    4. If \(\ch k = p>0\), an irreducible \(f\) is inseparable if and only if \(f(x) = g(x^p)\) for some \(g\in k[x]\).

    1. A root \(\alpha\) of \(f\) in a splitting field is repeated if and only if \(f'(\alpha)=0\), so \(f\) has a repeated root if and only if \(f\) and \(f'\) have a common root, if and only if \(\gcd(f,f')\neq1\); the gcd does not change under field extension.

    2. If \(f\) is irreducible, \(\gcd(f,f')\) is \(1\) or an associate of \(f\), and it is an associate of \(f\) if and only if \(f\divides f'\), which, since \(\deg f'<\deg f\), holds if and only if \(f'=0\).

    3. If \(\ch k=0\) and \(\deg f\geq1\), then \(f'\) has degree \(\deg f-1\), so \(f'\neq0\).

    4. Write \(f=\sum_i a_ix^i\). Then \(f'=\sum_i ia_ix^{i-1}=0\) if and only if \(p\divides i\) whenever \(a_i\neq0\), that is, if and only if \(f(x)=g(x^p)\) for some \(g\in k[x]\).

    A reducible polynomial with nonzero derivative can be inseparable: \(f(x) = x^2(x-1)\in\QQ[x]\) has \(f'=3x^2-2x\neq 0\) and the repeated root \(0\).

    Inseparable irreducible polynomials are polynomials in $x^p$

    In characteristic $p$, an irreducible polynomial is $g(x^{p^n})$ for a unique $n\geq 0$ and a separable irreducible $g$.Suggest a slogan

    Let \(k\) be a field of characteristic \(p > 0\), and let \(f\in k[x]\) be irreducible. Then \(f\) is inseparable if and only if \(f(x) = g(x^p)\) for some \(g\in k[x]\). Moreover, there are a unique integer \(n \geq 0\) and an irreducible separable polynomial \(g\in k[x]\) with \(f(x) = g(x^{p^n})\), and \(f\) is inseparable if and only if \(n \geq 1\).

    A polynomial has a repeated root in a splitting field if and only if it shares a root with its derivative. Since \(f\) is irreducible, \(f\) shares a root with \(f'\) if and only if \(f \divides f'\), and since \(\deg f' < \deg f\) this holds if and only if \(f' = 0\). Writing \(f = \sum_i a_i x^i\), we have \(f' = \sum_i i a_i x^{i-1}\), which vanishes if and only if \(a_i = 0\) whenever \(p \nmid i\), that is, if and only if \(f(x) = g(x^p)\) for some \(g\in k[x]\).

    For the second statement, let \(n\) be the largest integer with \(f\in k[x^{p^n}]\); it exists because \(\deg f \geq 1\). Write \(f(x) = g(x^{p^n})\). A factorization of \(g\) into nonconstant polynomials would give one of \(f\), so \(g\) is irreducible, and \(g\notin k[x^p]\) by maximality of \(n\), so \(g\) is separable by the first statement. Conversely, if \(f(x) = g(x^{p^m})\) with \(g\) separable and irreducible, then \(g\notin k[x^p]\) by the first statement, so \(f\notin k[x^{p^{m+1}}]\) and \(m = n\). Finally, \(n\geq 1\) if and only if \(f\in k[x^p]\), which by the first statement holds if and only if \(f\) is inseparable.

    Perfect fields

    A field \(k\) is perfect if either \(k\) has characteristic \(0\), or \(k\) has characteristic \(p>0\) and the Frobenius map \(k\to k\), \(a\mapsto a^p\), is surjective, that is, \(k^p = k\).

    For a field \(k\), the following are equivalent:

    1. \(k\) is perfect;

    2. every irreducible polynomial in \(k[x]\) is separable;

    3. every finite extension \(F/k\) is separable.

    An irreducible \(f\in k[x]\) has a repeated root if and only if \(\gcd(f,f')\neq 1\), which for irreducible \(f\) happens if and only if \(f'=0\). In characteristic \(0\) this never happens for nonconstant \(f\), so (1), (2), and (3) all hold.

    Let \(\characteristic k=p>0\). If \(k^p=k\) and \(f'=0\), then \(f(x)=\sum_i a_ix^{pi}\) with \(a_i=b_i^p\) for some \(b_i\in k\), so \(f=\bigl(\sum_i b_ix^i\bigr)^p\) is not irreducible; hence (1) implies (2). If \(a\in k\setminus k^p\), then \(x^p-a\) is irreducible over \(k\) and equals \((x-\alpha)^p\) over a splitting field, where \(\alpha^p=a\), so it is not separable; hence (2) implies (1). Finally, (2) implies (3) because the minimal polynomial of each element of \(F\) is irreducible over \(k\), and (3) implies (2) because a root \(\alpha\) of an irreducible \(f\) generates the finite extension \(k(\alpha)/k\), in which \(\alpha\) is separable exactly when \(f\) is separable.

    Perfect field

    A field \(k\) is perfect if every irreducible polynomial in \(k[x]\) is separable.

    A field \(k\) is perfect if and only if either \(\ch k=0\), or \(\ch k=p>0\) and the Frobenius map \(F\colon k\to k\), \(F(a)=a^p\), is surjective, hence an automorphism. In particular, every field of characteristic zero and every finite field is perfect.

    An irreducible \(f\in k[x]\) has a repeated root if and only if \(\gcd(f,f')\ne1\), and since \(f\) is irreducible and \(\deg f'<\deg f\), this happens if and only if \(f'=0\).

    If \(\ch k=0\), then \(f'\ne0\) for every nonconstant \(f\), so \(k\) is perfect.

    Let \(\ch k=p>0\). Then \(f'=0\) if and only if \(f(x)=\sum_i a_ix^{pi}\) for some \(a_i\in k\). If \(F\) is surjective, choose \(b_i\in k\) with \(b_i^p=a_i\); then \(f=\qty{\sum_ib_ix^i}^p\) is reducible, so no irreducible polynomial has \(f'=0\), and \(k\) is perfect. If \(F\) is not surjective, choose \(a\in k\) that is not a \(p\)th power, and let \(\beta\) be a root of \(x^p-a\) in a splitting field, so \(x^p-a=(x-\beta)^p\). A monic factor of \(x^p-a\) in \(k[x]\) of degree \(j\) with \(0<j<p\) is \((x-\beta)^j\), whose coefficient of \(x^{j-1}\) is \(-j\beta\); since \(j\) is a unit in \(k\), this would give \(\beta\in k\) and \(a=\beta^p\). So \(x^p-a\) is irreducible and not separable, and \(k\) is not perfect.

    The Frobenius map is an injective ring homomorphism, so on a finite field it is surjective.

    What is a perfect field, and when is a field of characteristic $0$ or $p>0$ perfect?

    Characterization of perfect fields

    Perfect means characteristic zero, or Frobenius-surjective in positive characteristic.Suggest a slogan

    A field \(k\) is perfect, that is, every irreducible polynomial in \(k[x]\) is separable, if and only if either

    • \(\ch k = 0\), or

    • \(\ch k = p > 0\) and \(k^p = k\).

    Algebraic extensions of perfect fields are separable

    In characteristic zero or over a finite field, every algebraic extension is separable.Suggest a slogan

    Let \(k\) be a field with \(\ch k=0\) or \(k\) finite. Then every algebraic extension \(L/k\) is separable.

    Such a field is perfect. For \(\alpha\in L\), the minimal polynomial of \(\alpha\) over \(k\) is irreducible in \(k[x]\), hence separable, so \(\alpha\) is separable over \(k\).

    Primitive element theorem

    Every finite separable field extension is generated by one element.Suggest a slogan

    Let \(L/k\) be a finite separable field extension. Then \(L/k\) is simple: there exists \(\alpha\in L\) with \(L=k(\alpha)\).

    Separability is transitive in towers

    An algebraic tower is separable from bottom to top exactly when both stages are separable.Suggest a slogan

    Let \(k\subseteq K\subseteq L\) be algebraic field extensions. Then \(L/k\) is separable if and only if \(L/K\) and \(K/k\) are both separable:

    Separability of a compositum

    A compositum is separable exactly when both constituent algebraic extensions are separable.Suggest a slogan

    Let \(k\) be a field and \(E, F\) algebraic extensions of \(k\) contained in a common field, with compositum \(EF\). Then \(E/k\) and \(F/k\) are separable if and only if \(EF/k\) is separable.

    A field with $p^n$ elements is a splitting field of $x^{p^n} - x$

    The field with $p^n$ elements consists exactly of the roots of $x^{p^n}-x$.Suggest a slogan

    Let \(p\) be a prime, let \(n \geq 1\), and let \(F\) be a field with \(p^n\) elements, whose prime subfield is \(\FF_p\). Then \(F\) is a splitting field of \(\rho(x) = x^{p^n} - x\) over \(\FF_p\), and the elements of \(F\) are exactly the \(p^n\) roots of \(\rho\) in \(F\).

    Construction of $\GF(p^n)$ as $\FF_p[x]/(f)$

    An irreducible degree-$n$ polynomial over $\FF_p$ presents the field with $p^n$ elements.Suggest a slogan

    Let \(p\) be a prime, \(n\geq 1\), and \(f \in \FF_p[x]\) an irreducible polynomial of degree \(n\), and let \(\alpha\) be a root of \(f\) in an extension field of \(\FF_p\). Then \[ \GF(p^n)\cong \frac{\FF_p[x]}{(f)} \cong \FF_p[\alpha] = \spanof_{\FF_p}\theset{1, \alpha, \ldots, \alpha^{n-1}}. \]

    Subfields of the finite field $\FF_{p^k}$

    $\FF_{p^k}$ has a unique subfield of size $p^\ell$ exactly when $\ell\mid k$.Suggest a slogan

    Let \(p\) be a prime and \(k,\ell\geq 1\). The field \(\FF_{p^k}\) contains a subfield with \(p^\ell\) elements if and only if \(\ell\mid k\). In that case the subfield is unique, equal to \(\theset{x\in\FF_{p^k}\suchthat x^{p^\ell}=x}\).

    If \(F\subseteq\FF_{p^k}\) is a subfield with \(p^\ell\) elements, then \(\FF_{p^k}\) is an \(F\)-vector space of some dimension \(d\), so \(p^k=(p^\ell)^d\) and \(\ell\mid k\).

    Conversely, suppose \(\ell\mid k\). Every element of \(\FF_{p^k}\) is a root of \(x^{p^k}-x\), which has degree \(p^k\), so \(x^{p^k}-x=\prod_{a\in\FF_{p^k}}(x-a)\). Since \(\ell\mid k\), \(p^\ell-1\) divides \(p^k-1\), so \(x^{p^\ell-1}-1\) divides \(x^{p^k-1}-1\) and \(x^{p^\ell}-x\) divides \(x^{p^k}-x\). Hence \(x^{p^\ell}-x\) has \(p^\ell\) distinct roots in \(\FF_{p^k}\). They form the fixed set of the field automorphism \(x\mapsto x^{p^\ell}\), which is a subfield with \(p^\ell\) elements. Every element of a subfield with \(p^\ell\) elements satisfies \(x^{p^\ell}=x\), so such a subfield is contained in, and hence equal to, this set.

    Prime subfield and isomorphism type of a finite field

    Every finite field has prime-power order $p^n$ and is isomorphic to $\FF_{p^n}$.Suggest a slogan

    Let \(F\) be a finite field. Then \(\ch F = p\) for a prime \(p\), the prime subfield of \(F\) is isomorphic to \(\FF_p\), and \(F \cong \FF_{p^n}\) for the unique integer \(n = [F:\FF_p] \geq 1\), so that \(\abs{F} = p^n\).

    Finite fields are not algebraically closed

    No finite field is algebraically closed.Suggest a slogan

    A finite field \(F\) is not algebraically closed.

    Write \(F = \theset{a_1, \ldots, a_q}\) and let \(f(x) \coloneqq 1 + \prod_{i=1}^q (x - a_i) \in F[x]\). Then \(f\) is nonconstant, and \(f(a_j) = 1 \neq 0\) for every \(j\), so \(f\) has no root in \(F\).

    Freshman's dream

    In characteristic $p$, the $p$th-power map preserves addition and multiplication.Suggest a slogan

    Let \(k\) be a field of characteristic \(p > 0\). For all \(a, b \in k\), \[ (a+b)^p = a^p + b^p \quad\text{and}\quad (ab)^p = a^p b^p. \]

    Quadratic extensions of $\FF_p$ are unique up to isomorphism

    $\FF_p$ has a unique quadratic extension up to isomorphism.Suggest a slogan

    Let \(p\) be a prime. Any two field extensions \(E/\FF_p\) and \(E'/\FF_p\) of degree \(2\) are isomorphic.

    Cyclotomic polynomials

    Let \(n\geq 1\) and \(\zeta_n \coloneqq e^{2\pi i/n}\in\CC\). The \(n\)th cyclotomic polynomial is the product over the primitive \(n\)th roots of unity \[ \Phi_{n}(x) \coloneqq \prod_{\substack{1\leq k\leq n \\ \gcd(k, n)=1}}\left(x- \zeta_n^k\right) \in \CC[x]. \]

    Let \(n\geq 1\). Then \(\Phi_n(x)\) lies in \(\ZZ[x]\), is monic of degree \(\phi(n)\), where \(\phi\) is Euler's totient function, and is irreducible in \(\QQ[x]\). Moreover, \(\Phi_n\) is the unique monic irreducible polynomial in \(\QQ[x]\) that divides \(x^n - 1\) and does not divide \(x^k-1\) for any \(1\leq k<n\).

    Primitive root of unity

    Let \(F\) be a field and \(n\geq 1\) an integer. An element \(\zeta\in F\) is a primitive \(n\)th root of unity if \(\zeta^n = 1\) and \(\zeta^m\neq 1\) for \(1\leq m<n\), that is, \(\zeta\) has order \(n\) in \(F^\times\).

    When is $\zeta$ a primitive $n$th root of unity?

    Splitting field of $x^m-1$ over $\QQ$ and its Galois group

    The $m$th roots of unity generate $\QQ(\zeta_m)$, whose Galois group is $(\ZZ/m\ZZ)^\times$.Suggest a slogan

    Let \(m \geq 1\) and let \(\zeta_m\) be a primitive $m$th root of unity in \(\CC\). The splitting field of \(x^m - 1\) over \(\QQ\) is the cyclotomic field \(\QQ(\zeta_m)\), and \[ \Gal(\QQ(\zeta_m)/\QQ) \cong \unitsof{(\ZZ/m\ZZ)}. \]

    Cyclotomic field

    Let \(n\geq 1\) and let \(\zeta_n\in\CC\) be a primitive \(n\)th root of unity. The cyclotomic field of \(n\)th roots of unity is \(\QQ(\zeta_n)\), the splitting field of \(x^n-1\) over \(\QQ\) [@DF04].

    More generally, for a field \(k\) whose characteristic does not divide \(n\), the splitting field of \(x^n-1\) over \(k\) is \(k(\zeta)\) for any primitive \(n\)th root of unity \(\zeta\) in it.

    Computing cyclotomic polynomials $\Phi_n$

    Cyclotomic polynomials factor $x^n-1$ over divisors and invert that factorization by Möbius inversion.Suggest a slogan

    Let \(n \geq 1\) and let \(\Phi_n\) be the \(n\)th cyclotomic polynomial. Then \[ x^{n}-1=\prod_{\substack{d \divides n \\ d > 0}} \Phi_{d}(x), \qquad\text{so}\qquad \Phi_n(x) = \qty{x^n-1} \inverseof{\qty{\prod_{\substack{d \divides n \\ 0 < d < n}} \Phi_{d}(x)}}, \] and \[ \Phi_{n}(x)=\prod_{\substack{ d \divides n \\ d > 0} }\left(x^{d}-1\right)^{\mu\left(n/d\right)}, \] where \(\mu\) is the Möbius function: \[ \mu(m) = \begin{cases} 1 & \text{if } m = 1, \\ (-1)^{k} & \text{if } m \text{ is a product of } k \text{ distinct primes}, \\ 0 & \text{if } p^2 \divides m \text{ for some prime } p. \end{cases} \]

    The first formula computes \(\Phi_n\) recursively: divide \(x^n - 1\) by the product of the \(\Phi_d\) with \(d \divides n\), \(d < n\), using polynomial long division.

    Cyclotomic polynomial $\Phi_p$ for a prime $p$

    For prime $p$, every nontrivial $p$th root is primitive, so $\Phi_p=1+x+\cdots+x^{p-1}$.Suggest a slogan

    For a prime \(p\), the cyclotomic polynomial \(\Phi_p\) is \[ \Phi_p(x)=\frac{x^p-1}{x-1}=1+x+x^2+\cdots+x^{p-1}. \]

    The roots of \(x^p-1\) are the \(p\)th roots of unity, and every one of them other than \(1\) is primitive because \(p\) is prime. So \(x^p-1=(x-1)\Phi_p(x)\), and dividing by \(x-1\) with FF-ED3CD at \(a=1\) gives the sum.

    What is the cyclotomic polynomial $\Phi_p(x)$ for $p$ prime?

    Cyclotomic polynomial $\Phi_{2p}$ for an odd prime $p$

    For odd $p$, doubling the index alternates the signs: $\Phi_{2p}(x)=\Phi_p(-x)$.Suggest a slogan

    For an odd prime \(p\), the cyclotomic polynomial \(\Phi_{2p}\) is \[ \Phi_{2p}(x)=\Phi_p(-x)=1-x+x^2-\cdots+x^{p-1}. \]

    Since \(p\) is odd, \(-1\) has order \(2\) and \(\zeta\mapsto-\zeta\) is a bijection from the primitive \(p\)th roots of unity to the primitive \(2p\)th roots of unity. Hence \[ \Phi_{2p}(x)=\prod_\zeta(x+\zeta)=(-1)^{p-1}\prod_\zeta(-x-\zeta)=\Phi_p(-x), \] the products running over the primitive \(p\)th roots of unity \(\zeta\), because \(p-1\) is even. Substituting \(-x\) in \(\Phi_p(x)=1+x+\cdots+x^{p-1}\) (FF-MUJDE) gives the sum.

    For \(p=2\) the formula fails: \(\Phi_4(x)=x^2+1\), whereas \(\Phi_2(-x)=1-x\).

    What is the cyclotomic polynomial $\Phi_{2p}(x)$?