Search the corpus

    Domains and factorization

    Contents

    The implications among the classes of rings, with a ring separating each class from the next, are on Which kind of ring is this?.

    Elements

    Let \(R\) be an integral domain. Elements \(a,b\in R\) are associates if \(a=ub\) for a unit \(u\), so factorizations are compared up to units and associates. A nonzero nonunit \(p\) is irreducible if \(p=ab\) implies that \(a\) or \(b\) is a unit, and prime if \(p\divides ab\) implies \(p\divides a\) or \(p\divides b\).

    Divisibility of elements

    Let \(R\) be a commutative ring and let \(q, r\in R\). The element \(r\) is divisible by \(q\), written \(q\divides r\), if there exists \(c \in R\) such that \(r = qc\).

    Units

    Let \(R\) be a ring. An element \(r\in R\) is a unit if there exists \(s\in R\) such that \(rs = sr = 1\). The set of units of \(R\) is denoted \(R^{\times}\).

    If \(r\in R^{\times}\), the element \(s\) with \(rs=sr=1\) is unique: if also \(rs'=s'r=1\), then \(s'=s'(rs)=(s'r)s=s\). It is written \(r^{-1}\), and \((R^{\times}, \cdot)\) is a group, abelian when \(R\) is commutative.

    Irreducible element

    Let \(R\) be a commutative ring. A nonzero element \(r\in R\) that is not a unit is irreducible if for all \(a,b\in R\), \[ r=ab \implies a \in R^{\times} \text{ or } b\in R^{\times}. \]

    Irreducible element of a ring

    Let \(R\) be a commutative ring. An element \(r\in R\) is irreducible if \(r\) is nonzero, \(r\) is not a unit, and whenever \(r=ab\) with \(a,b\in R\), \(a\) or \(b\) is a unit.

    When is a ring element irreducible?

    Irreducible element of a ring

    Let \(R\) be a commutative ring. An element \(p\in R\) is irreducible if \(p\) is nonzero, \(p\notin R^\times\), and whenever \(p=ab\) with \(a,b\in R\), \(a \in R^\times\) or \(b\in R^\times\).

    When is an element $p$ of a ring $R$ irreducible?

    Prime element

    Let \(R\) be a commutative ring. A nonzero element \(p\in R\) that is not a unit is prime if for all \(a,b \in R\), \[ p\divides ab \implies p\divides a \text{ or } p\divides b, \] where \(\divides\) denotes divisibility.

    Prime element of a ring

    Let \(R\) be a commutative ring. An element \(r\in R\) is prime if \(r\) is nonzero, \(r\) is not a unit, and for all \(a,b\in R\), \(r\divides ab\) implies \(r\divides a\) or \(r\divides b\).

    When is a ring element prime?

    Associate elements

    Let \(R\) be a commutative ring. Elements \(a, b\in R\) are associates if there exists a unit \(u\in R^{\times}\) such that \(a = ub\).

    Let \(R\) be an integral domain and \(a,b\in R\). Then \(a\) and \(b\) are associates if and only if \(a\divides b\) and \(b\divides a\).

    If \(a=ub\) with \(u\) a unit, then \(b\divides a\), and \(b=u^{-1}a\) gives \(a\divides b\). Conversely, suppose \(b=ac\) and \(a=bd\) with \(c,d\in R\), in the sense of divisibility. If \(a=0\), then \(b=0\) and \(a=1\cdot b\). If \(a\neq 0\), then \(a=acd\) gives \(a(1-cd)=0\), so \(cd=1\) because \(R\) is an integral domain; thus \(d\) is a unit and \(a=db\).

    (Prime and irreducible elements)

    In an integral domain every prime element is irreducible. In a unique factorization domain every irreducible element is prime. In \(\ZZ[\sqrt{-5}]\) the element \(3\) is irreducible and not prime, since \(3\) divides \(9=(2+\sqrt{-5})(2-\sqrt{-5})\) and divides neither factor.

    Classes of rings

    A commutative ring \(R\neq 0\) is an integral domain if it has no nonzero zero divisors, equivalently if \(ab=ac\) and \(a\neq0\) imply \(b=c\). It is a field if every nonzero element is a unit.

    Division ring

    A division ring, or skew field, is a ring \(R\), not necessarily commutative, with \(1\neq 0\) in which every nonzero element is a unit, that is, \(R\setminus\theset 0 \subseteq \unitsof{R}\).

    Zero divisor

    Let \(R\) be a ring. An element \(r\in R\) is a zero divisor if there exists \(a\in R\setminus\theset 0\) such that \(ar = ra = 0\).

    If \(R\) is commutative, then \(r\in R\) is a zero divisor if and only if the \(R\)-linear map \[ R \to R, \qquad x \mapsto rx \] is not injective.

    Zero divisor

    Let \(R\) be a commutative ring. An element \(r\in R\) is a zero divisor if there exists a nonzero \(x\in R\) such that \(rx=0\).

    Equivalently, the \(R\)-linear map \(R\to R\), \(x\mapsto rx\), is not injective, since its kernel is \(\theset{x\in R \st rx=0}\).

    What is a zero divisor?

    Integral domain

    A nonzero commutative ring \(R\) is an integral domain if it has no nonzero zero divisors: \[ \text{for all } a, b\in R,\quad ab = 0 \implies a = 0 \text{ or } b = 0. \]

    Integral domain

    An integral domain is a nonzero commutative ring \(R\) with no nonzero zero divisors: for \(a,b\in R\), \(ab=0\) implies \(a=0\) or \(b=0\).

    What is an integral domain?

    Field

    A field is a commutative division ring: a commutative ring with \(1\neq 0\) in which every nonzero element is a unit.

    Simple ring

    A nonzero ring \(R\) is simple if its only two-sided ideals are \((0)\) and \(R\).

    When is a ring simple?

    $A$ is a field iff $A$ is a simple ring iff every homomorphism from $A$ to a nonzero field is injective

    Show that TFAE:

    • \(A\in \Field\)

    • \(A\) is a simple ring, so \(\Id(A) = \ts{ 0, A }\).

    • If \(B\in \Field\) is nonzero then every ring morphism \(A\to B\) is injective.

    Solution

    Let \(A\) be a commutative ring with \(1\neq0\); ring homomorphisms preserve \(1\). Number the three conditions (1), (2), (3) in the order stated.

    <1>1. (1) implies (2).

    Let \(I\) be a nonzero ideal of the field \(A\) and \(0\neq x\in I\). Then \(1=x^{-1}x\in I\), so \(a=a\cdot1\in I\) for every \(a\in A\) and \(I=A\).

    <1>2. (2) implies (3).

    Let \(\varphi\colon A\to B\) be a ring homomorphism to a field. \(\ker\varphi\) is an ideal, and \(\varphi(1)=1\neq0\) gives \(\ker\varphi\neq A\). By (2), \(\ker\varphi=0\), so \(\varphi\) is injective.

    <1>3. (3) implies (1).

    Let \(0\neq x\in A\) and suppose \((x)\neq A\). The proper ideal \((x)\) lies in a maximal ideal \(\mathfrak m\) (Zorn’s lemma), and \(\pi\colon A\to A/\mathfrak m\) is a homomorphism to a field. By (3), \(\mathfrak m=\ker\pi=0\), so \(x\in\mathfrak m=0\), a contradiction. Hence \((x)=A\), so \(x\) is a unit, and \(A\) is a field.

    <1>4. Q.E.D.

    Steps <1>1, <1>2 and <1>3 give \((1)\Rightarrow(2)\Rightarrow(3)\Rightarrow(1)\).

    Euclidean domains, principal ideal domains, and unique factorization domains

    For integral domains, \[ \text{Euclidean domain}\implies\text{PID}\implies\text{UFD}\implies\text{integral domain}, \] and none of these implications reverses. In a Euclidean domain the division algorithm computes greatest common divisors; in a principal ideal domain \(\gens{a,b}=\gens{d}\) for a greatest common divisor \(d\) of \(a\) and \(b\); and in a unique factorization domain every nonzero nonunit is a product of irreducible elements, unique up to order and associates.

    Principal ideal

    Let \(R\) be a commutative ring. An ideal \(I \normal R\) is principal if there exists \(a\in R\) such that \(I = \gens{a} = Ra\).

    Principal ideal domain

    An integral domain \(R\) is a principal ideal domain if every ideal of \(R\) is principal.

    Prime ideals, factorization, and chain conditions in PIDs

    Let \(R\) be a PID.

    1. Prove that every nonzero prime ideal is maximal.
    2. Prove that \(R\) is Noetherian.
    3. Prove that every nonzero nonunit factors into finitely many irreducibles.
    4. Prove that every nonzero maximal ideal is generated by an irreducible element.
    5. Prove that \(\mathbb Z\) is Noetherian but not Artinian.
    Solution

    <1>1. Every nonzero prime ideal is maximal.

    Let \((p)\) be a nonzero prime ideal and suppose \[ (p)\subseteq(a)\subseteq R. \] Then \(p=ra\). Since \(p=ra\in(p)\) and \((p)\) is prime, either \(a\in(p)\) or \(r\in(p)\). In the first case \((a)=(p)\). In the second, \(r=sp\), so \[ p=spa. \] Since \(R\) is a domain and \(p\ne0\), \(sa=1\), hence \((a)=R\). Thus \((p)\) is maximal.

    <1>2. Every PID is Noetherian.

    Every ideal is principal, hence finitely generated. A ring in which every ideal is finitely generated is Noetherian.

    <1>3. Every nonzero nonunit factors into finitely many irreducibles.

    Suppose not. Choose a nonzero nonunit \(a_0\) with no factorization into irreducibles. Then \(a_0\) is reducible, say \[ a_0=b_1a_1 \] with both factors nonunits. At least one factor, say \(a_1\), also has no factorization into irreducibles. Then \[ (a_0)\subsetneq(a_1). \] Repeating produces an infinite strictly ascending chain of ideals, contradicting Noetherianity. Hence the process terminates and gives a finite irreducible factorization.

    <1>4. Every nonzero maximal ideal is generated by an irreducible.

    Write \(\mathfrak m=(m)\ne(0)\). Since \(\mathfrak m\) is proper, \(m\) is not a unit. If \(m=ab\), then \[ (m)\subseteq(a)\subseteq R. \] Maximality gives \((a)=(m)\) or \((a)=R\), so respectively \(b\) or \(a\) is a unit. Thus \(m\) is irreducible.

    <1>5. \(\mathbb Z\) is Noetherian but not Artinian.

    It is a PID, hence Noetherian. But \[ (2)\supsetneq(4)\supsetneq(8)\supsetneq\cdots \] is an infinite strictly descending chain of ideals, so \(\mathbb Z\) is not Artinian.

    Unique factorization domain

    An integral domain \(R\) is a unique factorization domain if every nonzero \(r\in R\) admits a decomposition \[ r = u \prod_{i=1}^n p_i \] with \(n\geq 0\), \(u\in R^{\times}\) a unit, and \(p_1,\ldots,p_n\) irreducible, and this decomposition is unique up to order and associates: if also \(r = v\prod_{j=1}^m q_j\) with \(v\in R^{\times}\) and each \(q_j\) irreducible, then \(m=n\) and there is a permutation \(\sigma\) of \(\theset{1,\ldots,n}\) such that \(p_i\) and \(q_{\sigma(i)}\) are associates for every \(i\).

    Unique factorization domain

    An integral domain \(R\) is a unique factorization domain if every nonzero \(x\in R\) can be written as \[ x=u\prod_{i=1}^n p_i \] with \(n\geq 0\), \(u\in R^\times\) a unit, and \(p_1,\ldots,p_n\) irreducible, and this decomposition is unique up to units and order: if also \(x=v\prod_{j=1}^m q_j\) with \(v\in R^\times\) and each \(q_j\) irreducible, then \(m=n\) and there is a permutation \(\sigma\) of \(\theset{1,\ldots,n}\) such that \(p_i\) and \(q_{\sigma(i)}\) are associates for every \(i\).

    What does it mean for a ring to be a unique factorization domain?

    Euclidean domain

    An integral domain \(R\) is Euclidean if there exists a function \(d\colon R\to \ZZ_{\geq 0}\) such that for all \(x,y\in R\) with \(y\neq 0\) there exist \(q,r\in R\) with \(x = qy + r\) and either \(r=0\) or \(d(r) < d(y)\). Such a function \(d\) is a Euclidean function on \(R\).

    Euclidean domain

    An integral domain \(R\) is a Euclidean domain if there exists a function \(f\colon R\setminus\theset{0} \to \ZZ^{\geq 0}\), a Euclidean function, such that for all \(a\in R\) and all nonzero \(b\in R\) there exist \(q, r\in R\) with \(a = bq + r\) and either \(r=0\) or \(f(r) < f(b)\).

    What is a Euclidean domain?

    Other classes of rings

    • A ring is Noetherian if every ascending chain of ideals stabilizes.

    • A ring is reduced if its only nilpotent element is \(0\).

    • A ring is local if it has a unique maximal ideal.

    • A valuation ring is an integral domain \(R\) with fraction field \(K\) such that \(x\in R\) or \(\inverseof{x}\in R\) for every \(x\in K^\times\); a discrete valuation ring is a valuation ring whose valuation has value group \(\ZZ\).

    • In a Dedekind domain every nonzero proper ideal is a product of prime ideals, uniquely up to order.

    • A Noetherian local ring \((R,\mfm)\) is regular if \(\dim_{R/\mfm}\mfm/\mfm^2=\dim R\).

    Noetherian ring

    A ring \(R\) is Noetherian if it satisfies the ascending chain condition on ideals: for every chain of ideals \(I_1 \subseteq I_2 \subseteq \cdots\) of \(R\) there exists \(N\geq 1\) such that \(I_N = I_{N+1} = \cdots\).

    Reduced ring

    A ring \(R\) is reduced if \(R\) contains no nonzero nilpotent elements.

    Reduced ring

    Reduced means no nonzero nilpotents.Suggest a slogan

    A commutative ring \(R\) is reduced if and only if it has no nonzero nilpotent elements, that is, its nilradical \(\nilrad{R}\) is \(0\).

    What is a reduced ring?

    Local ring

    A commutative ring \(R\) is local if it has a unique maximal ideal \(\mfm\), that is, \(\mspec R = \theset{ \mfm }\). The residue field of the local ring \((R,\mfm)\) is \(\kappa \coloneqq R/\mfm\).

    A ring in which every element is a unit or nilpotent is local

    Show that if \(R\) is a nonzero ring where every element is either a unit or nilpotent, then \(R\) is local.

    Solution

    Let \(N(R)\) denote the nilradical, i.e. the set of nilpotent elements of \(R\).

    <1>1. No nilpotent element of the nonzero ring \(R\) is a unit.

    If \(a^m=0\) and \(a\) were a unit, then multiplying by \(a^{-m}\) would give \(1=0\), contradicting that \(R\) is nonzero.

    <1>2. The set of nonunits of \(R\) is exactly \(N(R)\).

    By hypothesis every element of \(R\) is either a unit or nilpotent. By <1>1 these possibilities are disjoint. Hence an element is a nonunit exactly when it is nilpotent.

    <1>3. The set of nonunits is a proper ideal.

    Because \(R\) is commutative, its nilpotent elements form the nilradical \(N(R)=\sqrt{(0)}\), which is an ideal. It is proper because \(1\) is not nilpotent in a nonzero ring. By <1>2, this ideal is exactly the set of nonunits.

    <1>4. The ring \(R\) has a unique maximal ideal.

    Since \(N(R)\) is proper, it is contained in some maximal ideal \(\mathfrak m\). Every element of a proper ideal is a nonunit, so \(\mathfrak m\subseteq N(R)\) by <1>2. Thus \(N(R)=\mathfrak m\).

    If \(\mathfrak m'\) is any maximal ideal, then every element of \(\mathfrak m'\) is a nonunit, hence lies in \(N(R)=\mathfrak m\). Maximality gives \(\mathfrak m'=\mathfrak m\). Thus the maximal ideal is unique.

    <1>5. Therefore \(R\) is local.

    A nonzero commutative ring is local precisely when it has a unique maximal ideal. By <1>4, that ideal is \(N(R)\).

    $R_p$ is a local ring for $p\in\operatorname{Spec} R$

    Show that if \(\mathfrak p\in\operatorname{Spec}(R)\), then \(R_\mathfrak p\) is local with unique maximal ideal \(\mathfrak pR_\mathfrak p\).

    Solution

    Let \(S=R\setminus\mathfrak p\), so \(R_\mathfrak p=S^{-1}R\). The extension \[ \mathfrak m=\mathfrak pR_\mathfrak p \] is a proper ideal.

    We claim that every element outside \(\mathfrak m\) is a unit. Let \(r/s\in R_\mathfrak p\) with \(r/s\notin\mathfrak m\). If \(r\in\mathfrak p\), then \(r/s\in\mathfrak m\), so necessarily \(r\notin\mathfrak p\), hence \(r\in S\). Therefore \[ \frac{s}{r}\in R_\mathfrak p \] and \[ \frac rs\frac sr=1. \] Thus every nonunit lies in \(\mathfrak m\).

    Any proper ideal contains no unit, so every proper ideal of \(R_\mathfrak p\) is contained in \(\mathfrak m\). Hence \(\mathfrak m\) is the unique maximal ideal, and \(R_\mathfrak p\) is local.

    A ring is local if $R\setminus\mfm$ consists of units, or if $1+\mfm$ consists of units

    Suppose \(\mfm \in \mspec R\) is a proper maximal ideal. Show that under either of the following two conditions, \(R\) is local:

    • \(R\sm \mfm \subseteq \unitsof{R}\), so every element of \(R\sm \mfm\) is a unit, or

    • \(1 + \mfm \subseteq \unitsof{R}\)

    Solution

    Let \(R\) be a commutative ring with identity and \(N \da R\sm \unitsof{R}\) its set of nonunits.

    <1>1. If \(R\sm \mfm \subseteq \unitsof{R}\), then \(\mfm\) is the only maximal ideal of \(R\).

    The proper ideal \(\mfm\) contains no unit, so \(\mfm\subseteq N\), and the hypothesis gives \(N\subseteq\mfm\); hence \(\mfm=N\). A proper ideal \(I\) contains no unit, so \(I\subseteq N=\mfm\).

    <1>2. If \(1 + \mfm \subseteq \unitsof{R}\), then \(R\sm \mfm \subseteq \unitsof{R}\), so \(R\) is local by step <1>1.

    Let \(r\in R\sm \mfm\). By maximality, \(\mfm+\gens{r} = R\), so \(rt + m = 1\) for some \(t\in R\) and \(m\in \mfm\). Then \(rt = 1-m \in 1 + \mfm \subseteq \unitsof{R}\), so \(r\) is a unit.

    Dedekind domain

    A Dedekind domain is an integral domain \(R\) in which every nonzero ideal \(I\) factors as a product \(I=\mfp_1\cdots\mfp_n\) of nonzero prime ideals, with \(n\geq 0\) and the empty product equal to \(R\), and this factorization is unique up to the order of the factors.

    A Dedekind domain is a PID if and only if it is a UFD

    Show that a Dedekind domain \(R\) is a PID iff \(R\) is a UFD.

    Solution

    <1>1. If \(R\) is a PID, then \(R\) is a UFD.

    In a PID every nonzero nonunit factors into irreducibles, because the ascending chain condition on principal ideals holds, and every irreducible element is prime, because it generates a maximal ideal. Hence factorization is unique up to order and associates.

    <1>2. Suppose now that \(R\) is a Dedekind domain and a UFD. Then every nonzero prime ideal of \(R\) is principal.

    A Dedekind domain is Noetherian and every nonzero prime ideal has height \(1\). In a Noetherian UFD, every height-\(1\) prime ideal is principal. Thus for every nonzero prime ideal \(\mathfrak p\subset R\) there is a prime element \(\pi_{\mathfrak p}\in R\) with \[ \mathfrak p=(\pi_{\mathfrak p}). \]

    <1>3. Every nonzero ideal of \(R\) is principal.

    Let \(0\neq I\subseteq R\). Since \(R\) is Dedekind, \(I\) has a factorization \[ I=\mathfrak p_1^{e_1}\cdots \mathfrak p_r^{e_r} \] into nonzero prime ideals. By <1>2, write \[ \mathfrak p_i=(\pi_i). \] Then \[ I=(\pi_1)^{e_1}\cdots(\pi_r)^{e_r} =\bigl(\pi_1^{e_1}\cdots\pi_r^{e_r}\bigr), \] so \(I\) is principal. The zero ideal is \((0)\), hence is principal as well.

    <1>4. Therefore a Dedekind domain is a PID if and only if it is a UFD.

    The forward implication is <1>1. For the reverse implication, <1>3 shows that every ideal of \(R\) is principal, so \(R\) is a PID.

    Valuation ring

    An integral domain \(R\) with field of fractions \(K\) is a valuation ring if for every nonzero \(x\in K\), \(x\in R\) or \(x^{-1} \in R\).

    Discrete valuation ring

    A discrete valuation ring, or DVR, is a principal ideal domain that is a local ring and is not a field.

    Regular local rings, regular rings, and DVRs

    A Noetherian local ring \((A,\mm)\) is a regular local ring if \[ \dim A = \dim_{A/\mm} \mm/\mm^2 . \] A Noetherian ring \(A\) is a regular ring if \(A_\mfp\) is a regular local ring for every prime \(\mfp\).

    (valuation)

    Let \(K\) be a field and \(G\) a totally ordered abelian group. A valuation of \(K\) with values in \(G\) is a group homomorphism \(v \colon K^\times \to G\) such that \(v(x+y) \geq \min(v(x), v(y))\) for all \(x, y \in K^\times\) with \(x + y \neq 0\). Its valuation ring is \(R = \ts{x \in K^\times \st v(x) \geq 0} \cup \ts{0}\). A domain \(R\) is a valuation ring if it is the valuation ring of some valuation of \(\operatorname{Frac} R\), and the valuation is discrete if \(G = \ZZ\). [@Har10a, §I.6]

    By Krull’s height theorem, \(\dim A \leq \dim_{A/\mm}\mm/\mm^2\) for every Noetherian local ring, and \(\dim_{A/\mm}\mm/\mm^2\) is the minimal number of generators of \(\mm\). If \(A\) is regular, then \(\mm\) is generated by a regular sequence, and \(A\) is Cohen–Macaulay.

    A regular local ring is a domain, is a UFD by the Auslander–Buchsbaum theorem, and is therefore integrally closed. By Serre’s theorem, a Noetherian local ring is regular if and only if its residue field has finite projective dimension, if and only if it has finite global dimension; consequently every localization of a regular local ring at a prime is regular.

    For a Noetherian local domain of dimension one, the following are equivalent: it is regular; it is a DVR; it is integrally closed; \(\mm\) is principal. Hence on a Noetherian integral scheme regular in codimension one, the local ring at the generic point of each prime divisor \(Y\) is a DVR, and its valuation \(v_Y\) gives the coefficients of the principal Weil divisor \(\operatorname{div}(f)\) (D-5PQ5W).

    When is a Noetherian local ring regular?
    Characterise discrete valuation rings among Noetherian local rings.
    Is a regular local ring a domain? Is it integrally closed?
    Show that $R$ is a discrete valuation ring if and only if $R$ is a local PID that is not a field, and define a uniformizer.
    Show that the ring of germs at $0$ of holomorphic functions on a disc is a discrete valuation ring with uniformizer $z$.
    For the local ring $R$ of a curve at a point, over $k = \bar k$, identify the closed and generic points of $\Spec R$ and their residue fields, and decide which maps between $\Spec R$ and $\Spec \operatorname{Frac} R$ are morphisms of schemes.

    Regular local rings and regular rings

    Regular local rings have no excess generators: $\dim_k \mfm/\mfm^2=\dim R$.Suggest a slogan

    A Noetherian local ring \((R,\mfm)\) with residue field \(k=R/\mfm\) is regular if \(\mfm\) can be generated by \(\dim R\) elements, where \(\dim R\) is the Krull dimension of \(R\). By Nakayama's lemma for a local ring, the minimal number of generators of \(\mfm\) is \(\dim_k\mfm/\mfm^2\), so \(R\) is regular if and only if \(\dim_k\mfm/\mfm^2=\dim R\).

    A commutative Noetherian ring \(R\) is regular if the localization \(R_{\mfp}\) is a regular local ring for every prime ideal \(\mfp\subseteq R\).

    By Krull’s height theorem, the extension of Krull's Hauptidealsatz to ideals generated by \(r\) elements, \(\dim R\le\dim_k\mfm/\mfm^2\) for every Noetherian local ring \((R,\mfm)\); regularity is the case of equality.

    What is a regular ring?

    Structure theorems

    An \(R\)-module is simple if it is nonzero and has no submodules other than \(0\) and itself, and semisimple if it is a direct sum of simple modules. By the Artin–Wedderburn theorem, a ring that is semisimple as a left module over itself is isomorphic to a finite product \(\prod_i M_{n_i}(D_i)\) of matrix rings over division rings \(D_i\). By Wedderburn’s little theorem, every finite division ring is a field.

    Simple modules

    Let \(R\) be a ring. An \(R\)-module \(M\) is simple if \(M\neq 0\) and every submodule \(M' \leq M\) is either \(0\) or \(M\). A commutative ring \(R\) is simple if it is simple as an \(R\)-module, that is, if \(R\neq 0\) and its only ideals are \(0\) and \(R\).

    Semisimple modules

    Let \(R\) be a ring. An \(R\)-module \(M\) is semisimple if there is a family \((M_j)_{j\in J}\) of simple submodules of \(M\) with \[ M = \bigoplus_{j\in J} M_j. \]

    Artin--Wedderburn theorem

    Semisimple rings are finite direct sums of matrix rings over division rings.Suggest a slogan

    Let \(R\) be a nonzero unital ring that is semisimple as a left module over itself. Then there are integers \(m\geq 1\) and \(n_1,\ldots,n_m\geq 1\) and division rings \(D_1,\ldots,D_m\) such that \[ R \cong \bigoplus_{i=1}^m \Mat_{n_i}(D_i), \] a finite direct sum of the rings of \(n_i\times n_i\) matrices over \(D_i\).

    Semisimple rings are finite direct sums of matrix rings over division rings.

    Wedderburn's little theorem

    Finite division rings are fields.Suggest a slogan

    Every finite division ring is commutative, and hence a field.

    What links to this