Basic properties
\(H_0(X)\) is a free abelian group on the set of path components of \(X\). In particular, \(H_0(X) \cong \ZZ\) if \(X\) is path connected, and \(H_0(X) \cong \ZZ^{\abs{\pi_0(X)}}\) if \(X\) has finitely many path components.
Reduced homology of a wedge sum (Tag PR-B6BB2)
Let \((X_\alpha, x_\alpha)\) be pointed spaces such that each \((X_\alpha, \theset{x_\alpha})\) is a good pair. Then the inclusions \(X_\alpha\injects\bigvee_\alpha X_\alpha\) induce an isomorphism \[ \bigoplus_\alpha \tilde H_n(X_\alpha) \xrightarrow{\ \sim\ } \tilde H_n\qty{\bigvee_\alpha X_\alpha} \] for every \(n\) [@Hat02].
The wedge sum \(\bigvee_\alpha X_\alpha\) is the coproduct in the category of pointed topological spaces.
(Wedges of spheres)
For \(n\geq 1\) and \(k\geq 1\), \[ H_{n}\qty{\bigvee^{k} S^n} \cong \ZZ^k. \]
Give the finite wedge one \(0\)-cell and \(k\) cells in dimension \(n\). Its cellular chain group in degree \(n\) is therefore \(\ZZ^k\), with zero incoming and outgoing cellular differential in that degree, so \[ H_n\qty{\bigvee_{j=1}^k S^n}\cong \ZZ^k. \]
Homology does not commute with products: \(H_2(S^1\cross S^1)\cong\ZZ\), while \(H_2(S^1)\cross H_2(S^1)=0\). For a finite product, the Künneth theorem computes \(H_k\). If the homology groups of \(A\) are free, then \[ H_{k} (A\cross B) \cong \bigoplus_{i+j=k} H_{i}(A) \tensor H_{j}(B) \] and if the homology groups of \(X_1,\ldots,X_{k-1}\) are free, iterating gives \[ H_{n}\qty{\prod_{j=1}^k X_{j}} \cong \bigoplus_{\mathbf{x} \in \mathcal{P}(n,k)} \bigotimes_{i=1}^{k} H_{x_{i}}(X_{i}), \] where \(\mathcal P(n,k)\) is the set of \(k\)-tuples \(\mathbf x=(x_1,\ldots,x_k)\) of nonnegative integers with \(x_1+\cdots+x_k=n\).
Künneth isomorphism with free homology (Tag FF-UBJ3S)
Let \(X, Y\) be CW complexes, let \(R\) be a principal ideal domain, and suppose \(H_i(X;R)\) is a free \(R\)-module for every \(i\) (for example, \(R\) a field). Then for each \(k\) the cross product gives an isomorphism \[ \bigoplus_{i+j=k}H_{i}(X;R)\tensor_R H_{j}(Y;R) \xrightarrow{\ \sim\ } H_{k}(X\times Y;R) \] [@Hat02].
Excision (Tag T-FBMYQ)
Given subspaces \(Z \subseteq A \subseteq X\) with \(\cl_X(Z) \subseteq \interiorof{A}\), the inclusion of pairs induces isomorphisms \[ H_n(X\sm Z,\, A\sm Z) \mapsvia{\sim} H_n(X, A) \qquad \text{for all } n .\] Equivalently, for subspaces \(A, B\subseteq X\) with \(X = \interiorof{A} \union \interiorof{B}\), the inclusion \((B, A\intersect B)\injects (X, A)\) induces isomorphisms \(H_n(B, A\intersect B)\mapsvia{\sim} H_n(X,A)\) for all \(n\). The two forms are related by \(B = X\sm Z\) [@Hat02].
(Cellular-chain quick checks)
- If a CW complex has no \(n\dash\)cells, then its cellular chain group \(C_n(X)\) is zero, hence \(H_n(X)=0\).
- If a CW complex has a single \(0\dash\)cell, then its cellular differential \(d_1:C_1(X)\to C_0(X)\) is zero.
Computed homology groups
(Spheres)
\[ H_{i}(S^n) = \begin{cases} \ZZ & i = 0, n \\ 0 & \text{else}. \end{cases} \]
Real projective spaces
Homology of $\RP^2$ (Tag FF-SYCKI)
The integral homology groups of \(\RP^2\) are \[ H_k(\RP^2;\ZZ) \cong \begin{cases} \ZZ & k = 0,\\ \ZZ/2 & k = 1,\\ 0 & \text{otherwise} \end{cases} \] [@Hat02].
Homology of $\RP^3$ (Tag FF-MJEUU)
The integral homology groups of \(\RP^3\) are \[ H_k(\RP^3;\ZZ) \cong \begin{cases} \ZZ & k = 0, 3,\\ \ZZ/2 & k = 1,\\ 0 & \text{otherwise} \end{cases} \] [@Hat02].
Homology of $\RP^4$ (Tag FF-7LLAF)
The integral homology groups of \(\RP^4\) are \[ H_k(\RP^4;\ZZ) \cong \begin{cases} \ZZ & k = 0,\\ \ZZ/2 & k = 1, 3,\\ 0 & \text{otherwise} \end{cases} \] [@Hat02].
Complex projective spaces
Homology of $\CP^2$ (Tag FF-NEJ3S)
The integral homology groups of \(\CP^2\) are \[ H_k(\CP^2;\ZZ) \cong \begin{cases} \ZZ & k = 0, 2, 4,\\ 0 & \text{otherwise} \end{cases} \] [@Hat02].
Surfaces
Homology of the Klein bottle (Tag FF-QOQ2K)
The integral homology groups of the Klein bottle \(K\) are \[ H_k(K;\ZZ) \cong \begin{cases} \ZZ & k = 0,\\ \ZZ\oplus\ZZ/2 & k = 1,\\ 0 & \text{otherwise} \end{cases} \] [@Hat02].
Mayer-Vietoris
(Splitting over a free quotient)
Since \(\ZZ^m\) is free, every exact sequence of abelian groups \(0 \to \ZZ^n \to A \to \ZZ^m \to 0\) splits, so \(A\cong \ZZ^{n}\oplus \ZZ^m\).
Mayer--Vietoris sequence (Tag D-FAIJX)
Let \(X\) be a topological space and \(A, B\subseteq X\) subspaces with \(X = A^\circ\cup B^\circ\). Let \(i\colon A\cap B\hookrightarrow A\), \(j\colon A\cap B\hookrightarrow B\), \(k\colon A\hookrightarrow X\), and \(l\colon B\hookrightarrow X\) be the inclusions, and let \(H_n\) denote singular homology with integer coefficients. Define \[ \Phi\colon H_n(A\cap B)\to H_n(A)\oplus H_n(B),\quad \Phi(x) = (i_*x, -j_*x), \qquad \Psi\colon H_n(A)\oplus H_n(B)\to H_n(X),\quad \Psi(a, b) = k_*a + l_*b, \] and \(\del\colon H_n(X)\to H_{n-1}(A\cap B)\) as follows: every \(\alpha\in H_n(X)\) is represented by a cycle \(z = x + y\) with \(x\) an \(n\)-chain in \(A\) and \(y\) an \(n\)-chain in \(B\), and \(\del\alpha\coloneqq[\del x]\). The Mayer–Vietoris sequence of \((A, B)\) is \[ \cdots\to H_n(A\cap B)\xrightarrow{\Phi} H_n(A)\oplus H_n(B)\xrightarrow{\Psi} H_n(X)\xrightarrow{\del} H_{n-1}(A\cap B)\to\cdots\to H_0(X)\to 0. \]
Let \(X\) be a topological space and \(A, B\subseteq X\) subspaces with \(X = A^\circ\cup B^\circ\). Then \(\del\colon H_n(X)\to H_{n-1}(A\cap B)\) is well defined and the Mayer–Vietoris sequence of \((A, B)\) is exact [@Hat02].
Let \(C_n(A+B)\subseteq C_n(X)\) be the subgroup of sums of an \(n\)-chain in \(A\) and an \(n\)-chain in \(B\). Since \(X = A^\circ\cup B^\circ\), the inclusion \(C_\bullet(A+B)\hookrightarrow C_\bullet(X)\) induces isomorphisms on homology. The Mayer–Vietoris sequence is the long exact homology sequence of the short exact sequence of chain complexes \[ 0\to C_n(A\cap B)\xrightarrow{x\mapsto(x, -x)} C_n(A)\oplus C_n(B)\xrightarrow{(x, y)\mapsto x+y} C_n(A+B)\to 0, \] and \(\del\) is its connecting homomorphism; since \(\del z = 0\), the chain \(\del x = -\del y\) lies in \(A\cap B\) and is a cycle there.
When \(A\cap B\neq\emptyset\) there is an exact sequence of the same form in reduced homology, and there is an exact sequence for singular cohomology with the arrows reversed.
(Homology of a connected sum)
For connected closed \(n\)-manifolds \(M\) and \(N\), \(M\# N = (M\sm D)\union_{S^{n-1}} (N\sm D')\) for open \(n\)-balls \(D\subseteq M\) and \(D'\subseteq N\). The Mayer–Vietoris sequence for open neighborhoods of the two pieces, which deformation retract onto them and meet in a neighborhood of \(S^{n-1}\) deformation retracting onto \(S^{n-1}\), computes \(H_*(M\# N)\) from \(H_*(M\sm D)\), \(H_*(N\sm D')\), and \(H_*(S^{n-1})\).
Suspension isomorphism for the cohomology of spheres (Tag PR-6PENU)
For \(n\geq 1\) and all \(i\), the reduced cohomology groups of spheres satisfy \[ \tilde H^i(S^n) \cong \tilde H^{i-1}(S^{n-1}) \] [@Hat02].
The statement fails for unreduced cohomology: for \(n\geq 2\), \(H^1(S^n) = 0\) while \(H^0(S^{n-1})\cong\ZZ\).
Let \(n\geq 1\) and write \(S^n = A \cup B\) with \(A\) and \(B\) open neighborhoods of the closed northern and southern hemispheres, chosen so that \(A\) and \(B\) are contractible and \(A \cap B\) deformation retracts onto the equator \(S^{n-1}\). The Mayer–Vietoris sequence in reduced cohomology contains
\[ \tilde H^{i-1}(A) \oplus \tilde H^{i-1}(B) \to \tilde H^{i-1}(S^{n-1}) \xrightarrow{\delta} \tilde H^i(S^n) \to \tilde H^i(A) \oplus \tilde H^i(B) .\]
Since \(A\) and \(B\) are contractible, their reduced cohomology vanishes, so
\[ 0 \to \tilde H^{i-1}(S^{n-1}) \xrightarrow{\delta} \tilde H^i(S^n) \to 0 \] is exact, and \(\delta\) is an isomorphism \(\tilde H^{i-1}(S^{n-1})\cong \tilde H^i(S^n)\).
Further exact sequences
Künneth formula for homology (Tag T-TZ3X7)
Let \(X, Y\) be CW complexes and \(R\) a principal ideal domain. For each \(k\) there is a natural short exact sequence \[ 0 \to \bigoplus_{i+j=k} H_{i}(X; R) \tensor_{R} H_{j}(Y; R) \to H_{k}(X\cross Y; R) \to \bigoplus_{i+j=k-1} \Tor^R_1\qty{H_{i}(X; R), H_{j}(Y; R)} \to 0 ,\] and it splits, though not naturally: \[ H_{k}(X\cross Y; R) \cong \qty{ \bigoplus_{i+j = k} H_{i}(X;R) \tensor_R H_{j}(Y;R) } \oplus \bigoplus_{i+j = k-1}\Tor^R_1\qty{H_{i}(X;R), H_{j}(Y;R)} \] [@Hat02].
Universal coefficient theorems (Tag T-2W5WN)
Let \(X\) be a topological space and \(G\) an abelian group. For each \(i\) there are natural short exact sequences \[ 0 \to H_i(X;\ZZ)\tensor G \to H_i(X; G) \to \Tor(H_{i-1}(X;\ZZ), G) \to 0 \] [@Hat02] and \[ 0 \to \Ext(H_{i-1}(X;\ZZ), G) \to H^i(X;G) \to \Hom(H_i(X;\ZZ), G) \to 0 \] [@Hat02]. Both sequences split, though not naturally, so \[ H_i(X;G) \cong \qty{H_i(X;\ZZ)\tensor G} \oplus \Tor(H_{i-1}(X;\ZZ), G), \qquad H^i(X;G) \cong \Hom(H_i(X;\ZZ), G) \oplus \Ext(H_{i-1}(X;\ZZ), G) .\]
If \(H_i(X;\ZZ)\) and \(H_{i-1}(X;\ZZ)\) are finitely generated with torsion subgroups \(T_i\) and \(T_{i-1}\), then \[ H^i(X;\ZZ) \cong \qty{H_i(X;\ZZ)/T_i} \oplus T_{i-1} \] [@Hat02]. If \(F\) is a field, then \(H^i(X;F) \cong \Hom_F(H_i(X;F), F)\) [@Hat02].
Relative homology
(Relative and cellular homology)
If \((X,A)\) is a good pair, then the quotient map induces \[ H_n(X,A)\cong \widetilde H_n(X/A). \]
The long exact sequence of a pair is \[ \cdots\to H_n(A)\to H_n(X)\to H_n(X,A)\to H_{n-1}(A)\to\cdots. \]
For a CW complex \(X\), the cellular filtration satisfies \[ H_j(X^{(k)},X^{(k-1)}) \cong \begin{cases} \ZZ[\theset{\text{$k$-cells of $X$}}] & j=k,\\ 0 & j\neq k, \end{cases} \] since \(X^{(k)}/X^{(k-1)}\) is a wedge of \(k\)-spheres, one for each \(k\)-cell.
Exercises
$S^2\times\RP^4$ is not homotopy equivalent to $S^4\times\RP^2$ (Tag P-S7WVQ)
Show that \(S^2 \cross \RP^4 \not\homotopic S^4 \cross \RP^2\).
Solution
Take coefficients in \(\FF_2\), apply Kunneth to get \[ H^*(X_1; \FF_2) = \Extalgebra_{\FF_2}{x_2} \tensor_{\FF_2} {\FF_2\adjoin{y_1} \over \gens{ y_1^5 }} \\ H^*(X_2; \FF_2) = \Extalgebra_{\FF_2}{w_4} \tensor_{\FF_2} {\FF_2\adjoin{z_1} \over \gens{ z_1^3 }} .\]
Now use that any homotopy equivalence induces a graded ring isomorphism \(f\), where \(f(y_1) = z_1\) in \(H^1\), but these have different orders.
$S^n$ is not a strong deformation retract of $B^{n+1}$ (Tag E-AUAOC)
Show that \(S^n\) is not a strong deformation retract of \(\bB^{n+1}\).
Solution
If \(\iota S^n \injects \bB^{n+1}\) then a strong deformation retract yields a \(p: \bB^{n+1} \to S^n\) with \(p\circ \iota = \id\). Then apply homology to factor the identity map \(\ZZ \to \ZZ\) through a constant zero map \(\ZZ\to 0\).